Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?

[Merciadri Luca <Luca.Merciadri@student.ulg.ac.be>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ok, everything worked fine for the two precedent tests (but none of
them was posted to dk.test, because this group is unknown to my NNTP),
and I had:

==
# ngrep port 119
interface: eth0 (192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0)
filter: (ip or ip6) and ( port 119 )
#
T 192.168.0.101:55801 -> 130.225.254.104:119 [AP]
  POST..                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
#
T 130.225.254.104:119 -> 192.168.0.101:55801 [AP]
  340 340 <4be5648f$0$273$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (desired)..                                                                                                                                                                          
##
T 192.168.0.101:55801 -> 130.225.254.104:119 [A]
  Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus,dk.test..Subject: Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?..References: <87fx2366mv.fsf@merciadriluca-station.MERCIADRILUCA> <87pr17bmxy.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <878w7vxvcf.fsf@merciadriluca-station.MERCIADRI
  LUCA> <87wrvf8jy5.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk>..From: Merciadri Luca <Luca.Merciadri@student.ulg.ac.be>..Organization: ULg..Date: Sat, 08 May 2010 15:16:53 +0200..Message-ID: <87k4rebkje.fsf@merciadriluca-station.MERCIADRILUCA>..User-A
  gent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)..Cancel-Lock: sha1:NKNDXz3sPU1V2DYKPR+2LH4A30M=..MIME-Version: 1.0..Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8..Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit....-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----.
  .Hash: SHA1....asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sj..gren) writes:....Same test...- -- ..Merciadri Luca..See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/..- -- ....When love and skill work together, expect a masterpiece. (John.. Ruski
  n)..-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----..Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)..Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcryp                                                                                                           
#
T 192.168.0.101:55801 -> 130.225.254.104:119 [AP]
  t.sourceforge.net/>....iEYEARECAAYFAkvlZEUACgkQM0LLzLt8MhyjjwCfbEP5euHuU+vK9C2BYwJOax9F..yVAAn1ATjLguHutfu5uyUdB02nc4aIgT..=E7UR..-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----.....                                                                     
###
T 130.225.254.104:119 -> 192.168.0.101:55801 [AP]
  240 <87k4rebkje.fsf@merciadriluca-station.MERCIADRILUCA> Article posted..                                                                                                                                                              
#^Cexit
9 received, 0 dropped
==

I am still unable to say why it does not work for the two groups given
in the OP. It might be because they both exist, but would it be that?
I do not want to try with known groups (such as linux.debian.user,
etc.), because it would pollute the group!

- -- 
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
- -- 

Life has taught us that love does not consist in gazing at each other, but in looking outward together
   in the same direction. (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAkvlZS4ACgkQM0LLzLt8Mhz3MACgjgI/O8hB5gH+I7ouF+ND7wL+
LDoAn0//xurNQgGXOMVN032C+FuYbp2K
=mMgv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----