From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org
Subject: Re: gnus registry menu problem in emacs 23.1
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:55:54 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hbq1kl11.fsf@lifelogs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k4v0ojkf.fsf@lifelogs.com>
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:24:48 -0600 Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> wrote:
TZ> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 17:35:33 +0000 Paul Bibbings <paul.bibbings@gmail.com> wrote:
PB> However, with the same article selected as in 2. (above) clicking on the
PB> menu item:
PB> Gnus | Registry Mark | Important
PB> fails with:
PB> "Symbol's function definition is void:
PB> gnus-registry-set-article-Important-mark"
PB> Is anybody able to help me understand what the problem might be here?
PB> I'm at a loss, being quite new to Emacs and Gnus (though loving it, I
PB> have to say). The menu item seems to be hooked into the correct function
PB> call, but it is somehow believing that it is undefined, whereas the
PB> other tests (above) show that it clearly is, and operates properly.
TZ> Try using this in gnus-sum.el around line 2640:
TZ> ("Registry Mark"
TZ> ["Important" (lambda () (interactive) (gnus-registry-set-article-Important-mark)) t]
TZ> ["Not Important" (lambda () (interactive) (gnus-registry-remove-article-Important-mark)) t]
TZ> ["Personal" (lambda () (interactive) (gnus-registry-set-article-Personal-mark)) t]
TZ> ["Not Personal" (lambda () (interactive) (gnus-registry-remove-article-Personal-mark)) t]
TZ> ["Later" (lambda () (interactive) (gnus-registry-set-article-Later-mark)) t]
TZ> ["Not Later" (lambda () (interactive) (gnus-registry-remove-article-Later-mark)) t]
TZ> ["Work" (lambda () (interactive) (gnus-registry-set-article-Work-mark)) t]
TZ> ["Not Work" (lambda () (interactive) (gnus-registry-remove-article-Work-mark)) t]
TZ> ["To Do" (lambda () (interactive) (gnus-registry-set-article-To-Do-mark)) t]
TZ> ["Not To Do" (lambda () (interactive) (gnus-registry-remove-article-To-Do-mark)) t])
TZ> instead of the version that just calls those functions. I think it's
TZ> happening because the function is not defined when the menu is made, but
TZ> I don't know the exact failure mode.
TZ> If the above doesn't work, I may have to use `intern'. Does anyone have
TZ> a better idea? I don't want gnus-sum.el to load the registry because
TZ> not everyone wants it, but once this menu is built it's hard to update
TZ> it again.
Can anyone else try this change or suggest a better fix?
Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-01 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-16 17:35 Paul Bibbings
2010-01-29 18:24 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-02-01 15:55 ` Ted Zlatanov [this message]
2010-03-20 17:53 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-03-21 20:58 ` Paul Bibbings
2010-02-11 8:12 ` Paul Bibbings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87hbq1kl11.fsf@lifelogs.com \
--to=tzz@lifelogs.com \
--cc=info-gnus-english@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).