From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/2913 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marco Parrone Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: PLANNING-WITH-GNUS Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 23:42:57 GMT Organization: individual Message-ID: <87he4algqf.fsf@autistici.org> References: <871xw4omex.fsf@autistici.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138669181 16795 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 00:59:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:59:41 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:31:24 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed.gazeta.pl!news.nask.pl!news.internetia.pl!skynet.be!skynet.be!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!news-out.tin.it!news-in.tin.it!news2.tin.it.POSTED!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Yh3+Ercmb/2qhJF3blH3SMf+b88= Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.117.89.145 Original-X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@tin.it Original-X-Trace: news2.tin.it 1061509377 80.117.89.145 (Fri, 22 Aug 2003 01:42:57 MET DST) Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 01:42:57 MET DST Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:3054 Original-Lines: 59 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 3054 Tue Jan 17 17:31:24 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:2913 Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Felix Natter on Fri, 15 Aug 2003 12:11:11 +0200 writes: > hi, > > what about nntodo.el? > > Is this as good a solution for a TODO-list as nntodo.el is? > If not, would somebody help me finish nntodo.el? > (I'm just now upgrading to 5.10.2 and need to learn a lot about > Gnus to be able to do that) > > thanks, I'm sorry for the delay, I was busy and I have not read the newsgroup for some time. However I have not tried `nntodo.el', but thank you for having pointed out it, I will try it soon. However the PLANNING-WITH-GNUS method seems to be enough good for my needs, as I can divide the tasks in plans, I can update the status of the tasks with a reply, and I can put notes in the subject like a prefix that shows the pertinent sub-area of the task and a suffix for the queued tasks, for example in the `plan-hacking' group I can have the a task like: Subject: Re: project: translate program [queued: waiting for comments] >>>> translate >>> [status: done] >>>> send to the proofreaders list >> [status: waiting for Y] > [status: done] >>>> do the appropriate corrections [status: waiting for comments (max NN days)] >>>> send to who can upload it and I can close tasks simply with a reply with appended in the subject and in the body the `tag' `[closed: finished]' and mark it and the previous message in the thread (the thread contains the evolution of the task) as read (usually the last post of the thread is marked as `!' if the task is work in progress or suspended). - -- marc0@autistici.org 2143 9E77 D5E6 115A 48AD A170 D0EE F736 4E88 99C2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/RVge0O73Nk6ImcIRAi/VAJ92bfahRvhqRETn/sTzh3QEGlguqQCgi2Oh hIn59ptKIBezbYqf0PVcQQw= =092D -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----