From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/13089 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: Filtering Spam Messages With Bogofilter Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:51:13 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87iqepwtou.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <4135e24b-ba6f-4d91-875c-4a702c017641@g19g2000yqo.googlegroups.com> <87k5012uwi.fsf@lifelogs.com> <50af38b8-0de8-45fb-aebb-1704c482388f@j19g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <87vdjkz7q0.fsf@lifelogs.com> <6753d3c8-33f9-40ff-9cb0-6ace8fa1265a@d23g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1255035337 27424 80.91.229.12 (8 Oct 2009 20:55:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 20:55:37 +0000 (UTC) To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 08 22:55:27 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mvzvt-0003Vf-I7 for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:49:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33003 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mvzvs-0004m5-WC for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:49:53 -0400 Original-Path: news.stanford.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!newsserver.news.garr.it!kanaga.switch.ch!switch.ch!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.albasani.net!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Original-Lines: 70 Original-X-Trace: news.albasani.net mGe2BPsTDy1ZsxDTOaoW4+Q/s82IdHW9qXQ+14fDw4Kcvji2IOZ0GVg6Dx1b++6zmUaO9R5oRl0/Voig5OqRX0DYMhd3Lx+T9RzYSe497o/8ayxyMkcyKfFEUwLHdrBB Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@albasani.net Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 19:51:14 +0000 (UTC) X-User-ID: qwlv86SeuXCeHjHlCxaz4Z4GTWpV/gm3XZDGuPcSrxQ= X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Cancel-Lock: sha1:H51hFl2Un5I8+yIWpXrxX0xXnF4= sha1:CDBbb3/ldxMlGK4iOahqFSLodNI= User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NNTP-Posting-Host: RBn4gBYaRa00fGJcINiprDa2yvCbbqgv9xejQIlS/R8= Original-Xref: news.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.gnus:83450 X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:13089 Archived-At: On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:14:32 -0700 (PDT) Volkan YAZICI wrote: VY> On Sep 15, 3:57 pm, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> Bogofilter is not set as your group's spam exit processor (according to >> spam-group-processor-p).  Can you try using `G c' on a group and >> explicitly set it in the group/topic parameters, then mark spam and >> exit?  If that works, we can check what's inconsistent in your Lisp >> configuration (it looks fine as I said, but I may have missed >> something).  There are old-style and new-style backend specification >> formats, which makes it even more annoying for you I'm sure. VY> I "G c"ed into "misc" group and selected below parameters. VY> [X] Spam Summary Exit Processor: [Value Menu] Spam Summary Exit VY> Processor Choices: VY> Set: VY> [ ] gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-ifile VY> OBSOLETE: The ifile summary exit spam processor. VY> ... VY> [ ] gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-copy VY> OBSOLETE: The ham copy exit ham processor. [More] VY> [ ] Spam: Gmane Report VY> [X] Spam: Bogofilter VY> [ ] Spam: Blacklist VY> ... VY> [ ] Ham: Spam Oracle VY> Which spam or ham processors will be applied when the summary is VY> exited. VY> After pressing to "[Done]" I returned back to *Group* buffer and VY> marked an article in the "misc" group via "S x" and closed the group VY> buffer. Below are the related lines appeared in the *Messages* buffer. VY> Exiting summary buffer and applying spam rules VY> Registering 1 articles with classification spam, check spam-use- VY> bogofilter VY> Marking spam as expired without moving VY> it VY> Expiring articles...done VY> Quit This is good, it means the Bogofilter backend was called for that message. VY> But when I entered into "misc" group again, I still see the spam VY> marked message with an "E" status (as was before). Shouldn't it be VY> disappeared and messaged would have moved into "spam" group? You need to set up the spam move target explicitly through `G c' again. Give it a group name. The default (nil) means don't move, just mark expired. VY> BTW, I have below configurations in my ~/.gnus.el file and "misc" is VY> collected under "mail" topic. VY> (defun custom-nnmail-expiry-wait (group) VY> (cond ((member (gnus-group-topic group) '("mail" "personal")) 90) VY> (t 30))) VY> (setq VY> gnus-agent-expire-all nil VY> gnus-agent-expire-days 7 VY> gnus-agent-expire-unagentized-dirs t VY> nnmail-expiry-wait 7 VY> message-expires 7 VY> nnmail-expiry-wait-function 'custom-nnmail-expiry-wait VY> gnus-auto-expirable-newsgroups ".*") That's all fine, it just relates to expiry and not to spam.el. Ted