From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/17274 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bernardo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: rendering HTML: how to disable Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 08:40:01 +1100 Message-ID: <87k32bhwwe.fsf@deb.home.net> References: <87r3wlhjui.fsf@debian.uxu> <874mthpw8x.fsf@deb.home.net> <87zjb9d849.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <87zjb9nr1t.fsf@deb.home.net> <8761dw7uxv.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1417470112 13070 80.91.229.3 (1 Dec 2014 21:41:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 21:41:52 +0000 (UTC) To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 01 22:41:47 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XvYj4-0001pu-Hk for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 22:41:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34060 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XvYj4-0002xR-7n for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 16:41:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43138) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XvYiv-0002x4-3h for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 16:41:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XvYin-0001iC-LO for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 16:41:37 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:33681) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XvYin-0001ho-Ew for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 16:41:29 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XvYih-0001f0-7T for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 22:41:23 +0100 Original-Received: from 33.111.70.115.static.exetel.com.au ([115.70.111.33]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 22:41:23 +0100 Original-Received: from bernardo.bacic by 33.111.70.115.static.exetel.com.au with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 22:41:23 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 33.111.70.115.static.exetel.com.au User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:6i7JaDUm1pcpEGqFVsRmkALokhc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:17274 Archived-At: >> mostly guessing, but the unfiltered and rendered page contains much more >> information while the "sanitised" one contains just a *really* long URL >> (which, another guess, probably contains the recepient's ID embedded) with >> no other details visible; > >> you raise an interesting point, and in my mythical spare time it would >> be intriguing to fire up Wireshark to see what actually gets loaded when >> opening such a message; from past experience when looking what gets >> loaded when an innocuous looking web news page is opened with a browser, >> the picture is not pretty ... > > I just tested on my machine, and no images are fetched until I go M-x > gnus-article-show-images here. > > So I think you should scrounge up some mythical spare time and back up > your bug report with some data. it's not going to happen; i never claimed images were loaded; in fact images were never mentioned on my side, that's something you've introduced into discussion and ran with it; at this stage i'm not seeing any images and am happy with the suggested solution (i.e. mm-discouraged-alternatives setting)