Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?

[Merciadri Luca <Luca.Merciadri@student.ulg.ac.be>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

jgarciapa3@alumno.uned.es (José Manuel García-Patos) writes:

>>> Not really, no. I think testing should be done in dedicated test groups
>>> only, regardless of whether you test within a thread or create a new
>>> one.
>> I knew no other test group available on my news-gate than dk.test. :-(
>
> What about gnu.test? It wasn't that hard to find. Just a simple
> search on the *Group* buffer. Did you think that test groups only
> existed in Denmark, or what?
Your message looks nervous. I knew gnu.test, but my news-gate does not
know about it, sorry, I cannot modify my news-gate's feeds!

> Adam is right: Test groups (a whole lot of them, just try and search for
> them like I did) exist for a reason, and that is not polluting the real
> groups with test messages.
Sure. I did not say the opposite.

- -- 
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
- -- 

So many dreams are waiting to be realized.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAkvnBEAACgkQM0LLzLt8MhzERgCfQfdYNeNZG5TsstkfYwTSOn5j
hKQAniwYjQ2c/HZoDndqZeE50ZJLm51S
=FoQb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----