From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/12901 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: Filtering Spam Messages With Bogofilter Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:22:53 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87k5012uwi.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <4135e24b-ba6f-4d91-875c-4a702c017641@g19g2000yqo.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1252957260 22035 80.91.229.12 (14 Sep 2009 19:41:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:41:00 +0000 (UTC) To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 14 21:40:53 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MnHPw-0002jq-4A for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:40:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35097 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MnHPv-0008RD-KH for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:40:51 -0400 Original-Path: news.stanford.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.albasani.net!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Original-Lines: 39 Original-X-Trace: news.albasani.net mfP685g7uhmuOmYWAUYDYB8ger34eyT2dUNrB78JnVVv8rfnDI/evVdDrUwH9mJLpbwtyU6y6q3jzLocdISiQQI9L0tiScqdVPR3poYDvh2W3fyBzltXxnMPbsQQb7oi Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@albasani.net Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:22:54 +0000 (UTC) X-User-ID: E8CqSTMX8yScWt99BFNE8hEeLVwVSVC1c8LCKfhSSmU= X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Cancel-Lock: sha1:zTKW3WFXHNbxvPNnSkdanBlrpQU= sha1:yE0FypEtF+yCXC+8oR5IEoy7GuQ= User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NNTP-Posting-Host: /MbfESdgZlIuyYizV60YQYuSCCk1AciLBFzIsUaf6Hk= Original-Xref: news.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.gnus:83259 X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:12901 Archived-At: On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Volkan YAZICI wrote: VY> Below are spam related configurations in my ~/.emacs file. VY> (setq spam-use-bogofilter t) VY> (require 'spam) VY> (setq VY> gnus-spam-process-newsgroups VY> '(("nnml:.*" VY> (gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-bogofilter VY> gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-bogofilter))) VY> gnus-spam-process-destinations '(("nnml:.*" "nnml:spam")) VY> gnus-ham-process-destinations '(("nnml:spam" "nnml:reclassify")) VY> (setq spam-junk-mailgroups '("nnml:spam") spam-split-group VY> "nnml:spam") VY> When I mark a message as spam via S x, it gets highlighted white by VY> gnus, but I don't see any action performed by gnus to update the VY> bogofilter spam database. I'm suspecting some missing group-exit hooks VY> related with updating bogofilter spam database. (~/.bogofilter VY> directory is totally empty.) Does anybody have any ideas about what I VY> might be missing? (BTW, yes, there exists a `bogofilter' binary in the VY> $PATH environment variable.) Any helps will be really appreciated. Hi, your configuration looks OK. Can you turn up gnus-verbose to 9 and see what's in *Messages*? VY> OTOH, it'd be really awesome if people can share their own spam VY> configurations too. Mine is not exciting because it's entirely server-based, Gnus doesn't do much besides moving articles. I would appreciate it if you gave your opinion about spam.el in the spam2.el thread I started just recently. Thanks Ted