From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 21755 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2023 04:33:59 -0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (209.51.188.17) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 24 Oct 2023 04:33:59 -0000 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qv971-0001vG-LS; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 00:33:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qv970-0001v5-0G for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 00:33:50 -0400 Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qv96y-0007K4-N1 for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 00:33:49 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qv96w-0000ip-Ut for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 06:33:46 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org From: Pankaj Jangid Subject: Re: Correct ordering of items in mail threads Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:03:38 +0530 Message-ID: <87lebsprkt.fsf@codeisgreat.org> References: <877cngr24w.fsf@codeisgreat.org> <87sf623nni.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87lebumy5a.fsf@codeisgreat.org> <871qdm62p0.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87fs22zjht.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <87wmve4mpb.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87bkcqziyj.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <87sf624m5v.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87zg09okhs.fsf@codeisgreat.org> <87ttqhy1mx.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <874jiho0yb.fsf@codeisgreat.org> <871qdlw5eb.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:hv0/7wTYuDy7FIVN6U9s9Qe4rmo= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+ml=inbox.vuxu.org@gnu.org Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+ml=inbox.vuxu.org@gnu.org Adam Sjøgren writes: >> As we can see this is not possible. > > I cannot see this without examining the headers, maybe you can :-) My apologies for any confusion. What I meant to say is that, based on the date-time, an earlier message wouldn't typically have an 'in-reply-to' header referencing a later message.