From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 13109 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2022 21:37:06 -0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (209.51.188.17) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 23 Sep 2022 21:37:06 -0000 Received: from localhost ([::1]:40160 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1obqM4-00075d-Bo for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 17:37:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49384) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1obqLt-00073E-IT for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 17:36:55 -0400 Received: from pv50p00im-ztbu10011701.me.com ([17.58.6.53]:52386) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1obqLs-0003pA-22 for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 17:36:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=icloud.com; s=1a1hai; t=1663969009; bh=noLK2lviO5JEbotQhw6vmqy1n1rd333in3THfXd4BTQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ni/NFfyxMRedcSyGQDulz/QOH0ITWfWsswL07Qtj0fHdsv0RPCC3NZ4ilEURg0Yxz 5oFgNkT7GIeXjOFBZZyHSUQFskfBFVae50OaNHNs0WzWWB6GIxV8/3cYa+Eep9LCxn eEhnz0x1pbJi59wJfOM8X0y8/wwMoD1J4Br2qcNheAf+PWEM7/RynTyTX0Qkr2QQ9b 7fc7bGBM3aIF20WCufkrnasUJ+srEPdWrr5F2Flh8MY409LIoumyjKGRRntU9R22XP FntTjbOJrwVAgfXZyoTVVwwcor1xuVMLU5CrXh5W0Cewhq0EuiBAjGUyYS+nOxHw/Q BntpmeMFjgTXg== Received: from arch (pv50p00im-dlb-asmtp-mailmevip.me.com [17.56.9.10]) by pv50p00im-ztbu10011701.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21265B4067B for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 21:36:47 +0000 (UTC) From: Satoshi Yoshida To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org Subject: Re: Strip signature on reply without standard separator References: <87y1vykpl2.fsf@icloud.com> <87zggbz3ho.fsf@icloud.com> <87bksaz837.fsf@icloud.com> <87a67ul62m.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87mtbufg7e.fsf@icloud.com> <875yii2oru.fsf@dataswamp.org> <875yih6n25.fsf_-_@icloud.com> <878rnaw3tw.fsf_-_@icloud.com> <87mtbgarre.fsf@icloud.com> <87czcb6gjp.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87r10onki5.fsf@icloud.com> <8735d47zos.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87fsgsgpsv.fsf@icloud.com> <87illkyybp.fsf@dataswamp.org> <8735cl6qce.fsf@icloud.com> <87zgesx3zt.fsf@dataswamp.org> X-Operating-System: Linux version 5.19.10-arch1-1 Arch Linux x86_64 Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 06:36:48 +0900 In-Reply-To: <87zgesx3zt.fsf@dataswamp.org> (Emanuel Berg's message of "Wed, 21 Sep 2022 15:15:50 +0200") Message-ID: <87leq9lqmn.fsf@icloud.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 8Bo6F6SOzXieHwXhiS4aaXLj7R3kd-Lp X-Proofpoint-GUID: 8Bo6F6SOzXieHwXhiS4aaXLj7R3kd-Lp X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: =?UTF-8?Q?vendor=3Dfsecure_engine=3D1.1.170-22c6f66c430a71ce266a39bfe25bc?= =?UTF-8?Q?2903e8d5c8f:6.0.517,18.0.572,17.11.64.514.0000000_definitions?= =?UTF-8?Q?=3D2022-06-21=5F01:2022-06-21=5F01,2020-02-14=5F11,2022-02-23?= =?UTF-8?Q?=5F01_signatures=3D0?= X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=399 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2206140000 definitions=main-2209230140 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=17.58.6.53; envelope-from=dynamisxar@icloud.com; helo=pv50p00im-ztbu10011701.me.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+ml=inbox.vuxu.org@gnu.org Sender: "info-gnus-english" Emanuel Berg writes: > Just try - and you will fly ... > > ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t -*- > > (defun c () > (message b) ) > > (defun a (b) > (message b) > (setq b "ah") > (c) ) > > ;; (a "oh") > ;; ^ eval me Error message is displayed on *Backtrace* buffer. Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable b) (message b) c() a("oh") (progn (a "oh")) eval((progn (a "oh")) t) elisp--eval-last-sexp(nil) eval-last-sexp(nil) funcall-interactively(eval-last-sexp nil) call-interactively(eval-last-sexp nil nil) command-execute(eval-last-sexp) And "ah" is displayed on mini buffer in case without ";;; -*- lexical-binding: t -*-". > Also, byte-compiling this will echo a warning saying b is > a free variable, and this even under dynamic/special scope > where the code actually works tho (i.e. this particular use of > 'a' and 'c' where 'a' is used first). My understanding is 50%. Do you mean that using setq without ";;; -*- lexical-binding: t -*-" has no problem? -- Satoshi Yoshida