From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/18017 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: auto-kill mails with "X-Spam-Flag: YES" Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 01:48:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87lh6wrpqv.fsf@debian.uxu> References: <87lh6xfabl.fsf@gnus.org> <87si15dt9i.fsf@gnus.org> <87bn7tdrgj.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454892551 22094 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2016 00:49:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 00:49:11 +0000 (UTC) To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 08 01:49:02 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aSa0j-0000KO-1E for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 01:49:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39649 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSa0i-0001yh-Et for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 19:49:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41565) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSa0d-0001yI-Bi for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 19:48:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSa0Y-0005so-TX for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 19:48:55 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:54144) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSa0Y-0005sb-Ms for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 19:48:50 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aSa0W-0008Te-IC for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 01:48:48 +0100 Original-Received: from nl106-137-227.student.uu.se ([130.243.137.227]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 01:48:48 +0100 Original-Received: from embe8573 by nl106-137-227.student.uu.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 01:48:48 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org Original-Lines: 33 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: nl106-137-227.student.uu.se Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:f4nnz7nRnewloG+JMkFH0Mi/fhc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:18017 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I don't have X-Spam-Flag in my extra headers, but > I have To. If I score on that, it works as expected: > > (("extra" ("larsi@gnus.org" nil nil s "To"))) That works for me too but not so any header I try to add, e.g. Subject. Because the rest of scoring works, this is not an issue for me as I can get rid of them posts in other ways. So I'm just saying. By the way, is it recommended you use scoring to remove duplicate from Gmane groups as well? Which I have so far done with splitting: (setq nnmail-split-methods '( ("mail.ml-ooa" "\\(To\\|Cc\\):.*\\(help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org\\|gnuplot-info@lists.sourceforge.net\\)") ("mail.misc" "")) ) With scoring, does the unwanted stuff always turn up as "unread messages" in the Group buffer before they are expunged upon selecting a group? Or can it be done completely transparently? If not perhaps I'll stick to splitting. -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573