Re: Gnus and MTA(local)

Re: Gnus and MTA(local)

[Adam Sjøgren]

On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:33:57 +0900, Byung-Hee wrote:

> Actually Postfix setup is more easy than the others. So Postfix goes
> with many spammers, in recent.  To tell truth, i want to take off such a
> dishonor.

By that logic you shouldn't send email at all. Spammers send email.


  Best regards,

-- 
 "Oh, we all like motorcycles, to some degree."               Adam Sjøgren
                                                         asjo@koldfront.dk

Re: Gnus and MTA(local)

[Byung-Hee HWANG]

asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes:

> On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:33:57 +0900, Byung-Hee wrote:
>
>> Actually Postfix setup is more easy than the others. So Postfix goes
>> with many spammers, in recent.  To tell truth, i want to take off such a
>> dishonor.
>
> By that logic you shouldn't send email at all. Spammers send email.

You're right. My thought was wrong. Again back to the past, i'll use
MTAs without any complaint. 

-- 
Byung-Hee HWANG, KNU 
∑ WWW: http://izb.knu.ac.kr/~bh/

Re: [OT] Gnus and MTA(local)

[Andreas]

Sorry for the first followup was my fault. 
Anyway. QMail is something you really really really dont want to
consider in any way. Its buggy its creepy and I was informed by several
sources that its code and feature set are all based on _PATCHES_ that
YOU as a user have to put into it. As an analogy: Vanilla QMail will
make you feel like 1980s all over again. No features like mail bounce or
anything.

Exim I suspect is fine. 

I myself havent done much of any hacking/working on things like that.