Re: is this a bug in gnus v5.13? Re: gnus INBOX housekeeping, kept (copies of) mail lying around

[Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>]

asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes:

> Eric writes:
>
> [...trim your quotes, folks...]
>
>> (setq nnimap-split-fancy
>>       '(| 
>> 	("From" "googlealerts.*" "INBOX.google-alerts")
>> 	(any "c[...]" "INBOX.tmp")
>> 	;; Invoke the BBDB
>> 	(: (lambda ()
>> 	     (car (bbdb/gnus-split-method))))
>> 	;; Default mailbox
>> 	("INBOX" "")))
>>
>> I'm not a splitting expert (I've stopped using it, and wasn't very good
>> at it to begin with), but there are a couple of things odd about this.
>> First, I don't think that's how you're supposed to use
>> `bbdb/gnus-split-method'. The comments in bbdb-gnus indicate that you're
>> supposed to do something like this:
>>
>> (setq nnmail-split-methods 'bbdb/gnus-split-method)
>> (setq bbdb/gnus-split-nomatch-function nnimap-split-fancy)
>
> You don't have to, I have been using the former way since days of yore.
>
> The point is that I want the rules before the call to bbdb/gnus-split-
> method to "overrule" bbdb.
>
> (E.g. I want commit messages to go to a commit-group, regardless of
> whether I have the person who did the commit configured in bbdb to be
> split into another group).
>
> I have, however, also these two bbdb-splitting related settings:
>
>   (setq bbdb/gnus-split-default-group nil
>         bbdb/gnus-split-nomatch-function nil)
>
> I don't know if the first could be of relevance here - I guess not,
> because then Gijs' emails would have been going to mail.misc...
>
> (IMAP is complicated.)

Right, but the basic point remains that bbdb/gnus-split-method will
hijack the whole process unless you stop it -- though there are multiple
ways of stopping it. Anyhow, Gijs should have a few options to play with
now...


_______________________________________________
info-gnus-english mailing list
info-gnus-english@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english