From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/13703 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Harry Putnam Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: Hiding long headers Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:25:17 -0500 Organization: Still searching... Message-ID: <87mxxtokgy.fsf@newsguy.com> References: <86ljdfatrw.fsf@soton.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269703559 12263 80.91.229.12 (27 Mar 2010 15:25:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:25:59 +0000 (UTC) To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 27 16:25:53 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvXtS-0005hm-Cx for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:25:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45233 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvXtR-0004g1-Qk for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:25:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NvXtQ-0004fu-1r for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:25:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42075 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvXtO-0004fm-Ol for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:25:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvXtN-0003e0-Ay for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:25:42 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:55195) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvXtN-0003dp-5T for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:25:41 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvXtF-0005WL-0X for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:25:33 +0100 Original-Received: from c-98-215-178-110.hsd1.in.comcast.net ([98.215.178.110]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:25:33 +0100 Original-Received: from reader by c-98-215-178-110.hsd1.in.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:25:33 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 32 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-215-178-110.hsd1.in.comcast.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:gcvTud1HSLhI6owtxAp8ObwUoSg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:13703 Archived-At: Samuel Sinayoko writes: > Dear list, > > I'm a new user of Gnus. I'm getting more comfortable with it but am > having problems hiding long headers. After looking at the manual I've > added this to my .gnus file: > > (setq gnus-treat-hide-boring-headers 'head) > (setq gnus-boring-article-headers '(empty followup-to reply-to long-to)) > > However it had no effect. I also realised that I am not able to hide > headers at all (W W h). I have checked that > > gnus-show-all-headers's value is nil > > Has anyone had the same problem? Thanks for your help! I never see that problem. All I see in .gnus about headers that looks likely to bare on that is: (wrapped for mail) (setq gnus-visible-headers "^From:\\|^Subject:\\|^To:\\|^Date:\\|^Message-ID:\\|^X-Spam-Status:\\| ^X-HP.*:\\|^Newsgroups:\\|^X-Newsgroups:\\|^Keywords:\\|^Gnus-Warning:") Mine is more inclusive that most folks would probably want but you see the format there. If you set a regex similar in form but only including headers you want to see, does that do what you want?