From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/4462
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user
Subject: Re: How to combine spam-split with Subject filtering.
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:16:49 -0500
Message-ID: <87mzucxotq.fsf@mat.ucm.es>
References: <86zmzeqwcs.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <4nhdkmvora.fsf@lifelogs.com>
Reply-To: Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138670371 23328 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 01:19:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:19:31 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:33:48 2006
Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail
Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: maportatil10.quim.ucm.es
Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1108037808 9620 147.96.7.218 (10 Feb 2005 12:16:48 GMT)
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org
Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:16:48 +0000 (UTC)
X-Hashcash: 1:20:050210:gnu.emacs.gnus::FRuEfcCHwlsyyR1j:000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000005PId
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) XEmacs/21.4.16 (linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GsxdKC/mF2gQP1EqjeCGNXb0lU4=
Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:4603
Original-Lines: 28
X-Gnus-Article-Number: 4603   Tue Jan 17 17:33:48 2006
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:4462
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/4462>

>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

    Ted> On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, oub@mat.ucm.es wrote:

[snip]

    Ted>  You could use  spam-use-regex-headers.  Add  an entry to the
    Ted> spam-regex-headers-spam  list  to match  your   subject.  The
    Ted>  check  will be done  against  the headers  as  a whole using
    Ted> re-search-forward so just escape the brackets appropriately.

You mean this:

`spam-regex-headers-spam' is a variable declared in Lisp.
  -- loaded from "spam"

Value: ("^X-Spam-Flag: YES" "^Subject: POSIBLE SPAM SPAM.POSS")


    Ted> It would be nice if in addition to "Subject" we had "Subject+raw" as
    Ted> an alternative in case the user wants an exact match without regular
    Ted> expressions (ditto for all the other special headers that can be used,
    Ted> e.g. "From+raw").  Then "[POSSIBLE SPAM]" would just match, without
    Ted> the confusion about regex escaping and word boundaries.
Very true.


Uwe