From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/12293 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jidanni@jidanni.org Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: no gnus-mime-part-reply Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 05:45:45 +0800 Message-ID: <87oct3brli.fsf@jidanni.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1244158946 31232 80.91.229.12 (4 Jun 2009 23:42:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 23:42:26 +0000 (UTC) To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 05 01:42:24 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MCMZj-000086-HK for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 01:42:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49572 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MCMZg-00038P-7Q for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:42:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MCMQb-0007g6-83 for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:32:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MCMQW-0007eE-8K for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:32:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48103 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MCMQW-0007Yh-0s for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:32:52 -0400 Original-Received: from caiajhbdcaib.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.81]:51733 helo=homiemail-a4.g.dreamhost.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MCKl0-0000Ot-UU for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:45:55 -0400 Original-Received: from jidanni.org (122-127-35-242.dynamic.hinet.net [122.127.35.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by homiemail-a4.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666C641731 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:45:50 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:12293 Archived-At: Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > Although I don't feel like very much making `reply', `wide-reply', > `very-wide-reply', `reply-with-original', `reply-broken-reply-to', > `mail-forward', `followup',... You don't have to. Now that I discovered C-d, I am in heaven. The problem is when we went to gnus school, we only learned C-d was to be used for digests, E.g., RISKS DIGEST. Therefore, the documentation of C-d needs to promote it more, "the household knife that will be the last you need to buy, for so many tasks!" Furthermore, C-d indents, and even uses 1a. 3b. etc, instead of a flat: [1. text/plain] [2. message/rfc822] [3. text/plain] [4. text/plain] [5. message/rfc822] Therefore the above flat list needs to take a lesson from C-d, and though not indenting, still needs to reveal structure, by using 1a. 2c, etc.