From: hobbes@easynet.be (Rémi Letot)
Subject: which gpg-signing method to choose ?
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 09:45:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87offhdfbv.fsf@easynet.be> (raw)
Hi all,
gnus offers several methods to gpg sign and encrypt mail and news
posts :
PGP/MIME
PGP
S/MIME
What are the differences, and which one is to be used for maximum
compatibility with windows/outlook users ?
Thanks,
--
Rémi
reply other threads:[~2002-05-15 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87offhdfbv.fsf@easynet.be \
--to=hobbes@easynet.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).