Announcements and discussions for Gnus, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleksandr Gavenko <gavenkoa@gmail.com>
To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Scoring
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:49:35 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r4poo3o0.fsf@gavenkoa.example.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <873924eg32.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de>

On 2012-09-26, Tassilo Horn wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I use adaptive scoring for years, but now I wanted to upscore one thread
> manually, too.  So I've hit `I T RET' in the summary with point on that
> thread, but `V S' on it after reentering the summary shows that it was
> only scored up 5 "dollars", not 1000 as suggested by the docstring of
> `gnus-score-interactive-default-score'.
>
> Incidentally, my adaptive scoring rules add the score 5 to read
> messages.  So can it be that adaptive scoring overrides my manual
> score changes?
>
Currently I have trapped to same issue. Look for response to me:

  http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/82354

  The usual reason for score not working as expected is that there is a
  different rule that lowers or rises the score.  Could eg. be a rule on
  the subject that classifies it as something you don't want to see.

I use adaptive scoring:

  ;; .emacs
  (setq gnus-default-adaptive-score-alist
      '(
        (gnus-unread-mark)
        (gnus-ticked-mark (subject 100))
        (gnus-dormant-mark (subject 100))

  ;; ~/.gnus/score/all.SCORE
    ("from"
     ("gavenkoa" 200 nil s))

and instead of getting 200 point for my articles I have 100 point as I
previously (so I reload Gnus and Emacs) mark some articles in thread with same
subject...

It is bad to have adaptive scoring that overwrite user setting with probably
have high height in most cases.

I interesting in this topic but have no time to research what happen.

-- 
Best regards!

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-26 21:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-26 19:31 Scoring Tassilo Horn
2012-09-26 21:49 ` Oleksandr Gavenko [this message]
2012-09-27  6:12   ` Scoring Tassilo Horn
2012-09-27  6:25     ` Scoring Tassilo Horn
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-04-22  0:01 Scoring David Breton
2009-04-22  4:35 ` Scoring Richard Riley
2009-04-22 11:42 ` Scoring Lowell Gilbert
2009-04-22 12:03   ` Scoring Andrzej Adam Filip
2009-04-22 20:48   ` Scoring David Breton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r4poo3o0.fsf@gavenkoa.example.com \
    --to=gavenkoa@gmail.com \
    --cc=info-gnus-english@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).