From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/15836 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Oleksandr Gavenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: Scoring Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:49:35 +0300 Organization: Oleksandr Gavenko , http://gavenkoa.users.sf.net Message-ID: <87r4poo3o0.fsf@gavenkoa.example.com> References: <873924eg32.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348696517 25556 80.91.229.3 (26 Sep 2012 21:55:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:55:17 +0000 (UTC) To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 26 23:55:22 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TGzZf-0001Wk-4W for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:55:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54138 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGzZa-0002au-5a for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:55:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51795) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGzZU-0002MX-Qq for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:55:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGzZR-0005JU-VZ for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:55:08 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:45178) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGzZR-0005Hv-PV for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:55:05 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TGzUL-0005zF-50 for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:49:49 +0200 Original-Received: from 46.118.13.139 ([46.118.13.139]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:49:49 +0200 Original-Received: from gavenkoa by 46.118.13.139 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:49:49 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 46 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 46.118.13.139 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:SR81Jf9RzV84h2rcFDT+6gj+Mjs= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:15836 Archived-At: On 2012-09-26, Tassilo Horn wrote: > Hi all, > > I use adaptive scoring for years, but now I wanted to upscore one thread > manually, too. So I've hit `I T RET' in the summary with point on that > thread, but `V S' on it after reentering the summary shows that it was > only scored up 5 "dollars", not 1000 as suggested by the docstring of > `gnus-score-interactive-default-score'. > > Incidentally, my adaptive scoring rules add the score 5 to read > messages. So can it be that adaptive scoring overrides my manual > score changes? > Currently I have trapped to same issue. Look for response to me: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/82354 The usual reason for score not working as expected is that there is a different rule that lowers or rises the score. Could eg. be a rule on the subject that classifies it as something you don't want to see. I use adaptive scoring: ;; .emacs (setq gnus-default-adaptive-score-alist '( (gnus-unread-mark) (gnus-ticked-mark (subject 100)) (gnus-dormant-mark (subject 100)) ;; ~/.gnus/score/all.SCORE ("from" ("gavenkoa" 200 nil s)) and instead of getting 200 point for my articles I have 100 point as I previously (so I reload Gnus and Emacs) mark some articles in thread with same subject... It is bad to have adaptive scoring that overwrite user setting with probably have high height in most cases. I interesting in this topic but have no time to research what happen. -- Best regards!