From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/11144 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daiki Ueno Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: signing & encrypting fails Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:29:56 +0900 Message-ID: <87r6anlg4b.fsf@broken.deisui.org> References: <87skv4cx90.fsf@nitai.hr> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1214274614 1109 80.91.229.12 (24 Jun 2008 02:30:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: info-gnus-english@gnu.org To: Gour Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 24 04:30:59 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KAyJ9-0000dS-4D for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 04:30:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53162 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KAyIJ-00085Y-KD for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KAyIH-00085G-Nl for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:30:05 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KAyIG-00084y-2N for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:30:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53429 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KAyIF-00084p-TA for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.241]:27104) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KAyIF-0003cq-JP for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id k29so9651559rvb.6 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:30:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :sender; bh=VcKT5/dW5cKdHPlZAhBFkMJsNp3oJ0El4tFKm/ITcSk=; b=em+NX5xVt0G9IEMS4K3sIyYGrk5ldFHnjglFksbRr7QEGpIaJwKo1ICuxDAGw2MM+t DfezY+bTdoLFOQuu1NYTelyyPiYt0Lut4NFTk3I+I37H33nD0hJAGNM4gMfC8cKIdC9n 7I3iWPpam15ufFTDSDz5NSgf7mZN3ZO4XtuAY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=NK0bs+zCAwKUpBJFKwheiNxlDTKNfbc8HU9LMNHg6Pvq28mxL+zOyZ0sPJDzEN5WzS Stf8VfOS0uk2wm5ai54Qe8PMmt5sbBxHk4cZ2ASlgu8hPrej4ERDiMJufjzHHnFaVh0N v1IMNVKzIhwCOZ+RsN1J1wLZDRLMsjVnXWkkc= Original-Received: by 10.140.126.10 with SMTP id y10mr13826367rvc.214.1214274602724; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from p360 ( [150.82.173.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm11200659wrh.40.2008.06.23.19.29.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:30:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87skv4cx90.fsf@nitai.hr> (gour@mail.inet.hr's message of "Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:32:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:11144 Archived-At: >>>>> In <87skv4cx90.fsf@nitai.hr> >>>>> Gour wrote: > If i try to sign & encrypt email the message is signed only and contains > <#secure method=pgpmime mode=encrypt> > instead of being encrypted. What the actual command did you use? I guess that you typed: C-c RET C-s, then, C-c RET C-c. If so, try C-c RET C-e instead. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno