From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/9120 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tim X Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: can gnus do this ? Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:19:58 +1000 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <87r6onku8x.fsf@lion.rapttech.com.au> References: <1181134359.795974@vasbyt.isdsl.net> <877iqhz00m.fsf@W0053328.mgh.harvard.edu> <46680bf1$0$40525$dbd41001@news.wanadoo.nl> <87r6on95fy.fsf@W0053328.mgh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181298527 8450 80.91.229.12 (8 Jun 2007 10:28:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 10:28:47 +0000 (UTC) To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 08 12:28:46 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hwbi2-0000U2-1n for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:28:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hwbi1-0004OC-H3 for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 06:28:45 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sn-xt-sjc-03!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:UQ0wQ+2eJX6nFlPS8tfxSQUsbII= Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Original-Lines: 23 Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.gnus:79303 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 06:28:38 -0400 X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:9120 Archived-At: jadamson@partners.org (Joel J. Adamson) writes: > Another difference in my situation is that I'm relaying mail to a pop > server on our main network, rather than using my own mail system to > send mail out to the internet. > Due to issues of spam and misconfigured MTAs, many ISPs are now blocking access to port 25 on dynamic mail addresses they allocate to users. I've also seen quite a few ISPs who actually put their dynamic IP addresses into various blacklists, like those run by SpamCop etc. This emans that many sites will block an e-mail that comes from a server running on a dynamic IP which is allocated by an ISP to their users. Putting these two points together, it is now beginning to make more sense for users to use their ISPs mail server rather than one they have on their own system. This is what I do and I don't miss the config/maintenance of a local MTA at all! Tim -- tcross (at) rapttech dot com dot au