From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/3224 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Arne_J=F8rgensen?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: S/MIME oddness Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 19:02:15 +0100 Organization: emfle birnan Message-ID: <87r7zs1ie0.fsf@seamus.arnested.dk> References: <87wu9mskr9.fsf@seamus.arnested.dk> <87r7zt24yd.fsf@seamus.arnested.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138669400 18102 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 01:03:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:31:53 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!nsc.no!nextra.com!uio.no!newsfeed1.uni2.dk!news.net.uni-c.dk!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: horse01.daimi.au.dk Original-X-Trace: news.net.uni-c.dk 1070042266 8259 130.225.18.241 (28 Nov 2003 17:57:46 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.net.uni-c.dk Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 17:57:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Face: 5t,7/Y$&<1A_t.$vC2{pWZ{m@3_06;kcm]no{hgEL/}Uz(>XV6cl4}xO\v?-h3%>znNaZtq `~rf,GY1T%r=a.zH`hOb(-]'x)nI088Z&|e;V^h;/TShou User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:djvcPyVxYqvf+0yo09r94E7qxKE= Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:3365 Original-Lines: 53 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 3365 Tue Jan 17 17:31:53 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:3224 Archived-At: Simon Josefsson writes: > Arne Jørgensen writes: [...] >> But the version that i Gcc to my self does not have an extra blank > > Perhaps ^M isn't treated as newline by the Gcc backend? Some backends > either replace \r\n with \n, or uses \r?\n as the newline regexp. > >> and switching to smtpmail.el made the problem go away. > > SMTP uses \r\n as newline, perhaps \r\r\n is treated as a single > newline by some implementations. > >> I think that doesn't make OpenSSL an usual suspect. > > Still not impossible, I think, although the OpenSSL version that had > this bug is quite old and insecure, so it is only a remote > possibility. > > Hm. Can you reproduce the added newline bug by previewing a S/MIME > signed message? I have previewed the message and found no extra newlines. Besides I have a rather new OpenSSL (0.9.7c 30 Sep 2003). I still suspect Postfix to be the problem. Here is what I tried: I copied the GCC-ed version (which doesn't have an extra line) to a file and piped it to Postfix sendmail: cat testmail.txt | /usr/lib/sendmail -t When the mail arrives in my inbox it has the extra line. This was all done on one machine (delivery to local user). Then I logged in to another machine (with Sendmail) and did the same trick. The message had no extra blank line. The testmail.txt can be located at . So I think this is not a Gnus problem (unless Gnus produces some invalid MIME that only some mail servers stumble across). I think I'll try reporting this to a postfix mailing list. -- Arne Jørgensen Valby Langgade 272, 1. tv., DK-2500 Valby, Denmark phone: +45 36 44 18 03, mobile: +45 21 65 01 13 email: arne@arnested.dk,