From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/14562 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric S Fraga Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: my vs maildir Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:37:20 +0000 Message-ID: <87sjx6t2db.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> References: <87aajmrkgb.fsf@towardsfreedom.com> <87wrmpnfvm.fsf@towardsfreedom.com> <8739pczsb7.fsf@nzebook.haselwarter.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294344125 11658 80.91.229.12 (6 Jan 2011 20:02:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 20:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: info-gnus-english@gnu.org To: Philipp Haselwarter Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 06 21:02:01 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Paw1m-0002TC-ID for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:01:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41800 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pavnl-0003j0-Oz for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 14:47:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40829 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pavnh-0003hO-Le for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 14:47:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pavnf-0006YO-Fk for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 14:47:09 -0500 Original-Received: from vscane-b.ucl.ac.uk ([144.82.108.141]:35699) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pavnf-0006Xb-Bi for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 14:47:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [85.210.140.71] (helo=localhost) by vscane-b.ucl.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pavn7-0003yF-Cy; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 19:46:36 +0000 In-Reply-To: <8739pczsb7.fsf@nzebook.haselwarter.org> (Philipp Haselwarter's message of "Sat, 01 Jan 2011 14:06:52 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Face: av6A"vZ{AypDB`d^.T35oG%$E*Qh]4F)K=*$-NHz5{7WZfAFQFB]F@gf}l9`XLs9(iD?D/! nafKE,S#G!4W/flj=9(U{]t'lP,,5~:s*~;kKR X-UCL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the UCL Helpdesk, helpdesk@ucl.ac.uk for more information X-UCL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UCL-MailScanner-From: e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:14562 Archived-At: Philipp Haselwarter writes: > I'll never understand why people prefer spamming their inboxes over > setting up a virtual group fed by 'inbox' and 'sent'... One reason for using self-Gcc, say, is that my different folders have different expiry conditions and I would prefer my side of conversations to expire under the same conditions. Having all sent mail going into one group and using virtual groups, as you suggest, would lead to inconsistent expiration states. Unless I have misunderstood you, which is always possible given my level of understanding of all things gnus related... :( -- : Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 23.2.1 + No Gnus v0.11