From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 26011 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2022 22:34:14 -0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (209.51.188.17) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 24 Aug 2022 22:34:14 -0000 Received: from localhost ([::1]:43888 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQywu-0000Mo-B2 for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:34:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59654) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQypn-0000iF-57 for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:26:53 -0400 Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:43392) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQypl-0007zY-AH for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:26:50 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oQypj-0007o0-7B for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:26:47 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org From: Michael Heerdegen Subject: Re: Strip signature on reply without standard separator Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:26:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87tu61i8gt.fsf@web.de> References: <87y1vykpl2.fsf@icloud.com> <87zggbz3ho.fsf@icloud.com> <87bksaz837.fsf@icloud.com> <87a67ul62m.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87mtbufg7e.fsf@icloud.com> <875yii2oru.fsf@dataswamp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:VVC77+3//TsIjF7F2GKRJ+hybTs= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+ml=inbox.vuxu.org@gnu.org Sender: "info-gnus-english" Emanuel Berg writes: > If you quote a lambda it is just a list with data: > > '(a b c) > > '(lambda not an anonymous function) > > Eval and you will see, there's no difference in > principle. Lists. Yes - and you want to make your lambda forms subject to evaluation, for several different reasons. They are not data. You want to use the return value, not the expression. Michael.