Re: alt-tab? really? you're joking...

[incal <embe8573@student.uu.se>]

Hikaru Ichijyo <ichijyo@macross.sdf.jp> writes:

> In bug #1, "M-TAB conflicts with ispell"

That's good news, a bug can be fixed and this one
already is you just said (?).

> (and they could have also mentioned, the
> window-switching keys of half the desktop managers
> in existence, but they didn't mention that), they
> say:

"Window manager" I think if you mean openbox,
metacity, and those. But those designations are too
similar, too much intersection and "that doesn't say
much", yeah.

But that is nothing to think about, I think, the
important thing is everything is configurable the way
YOU want it. I have come across many, many variables
and settings that I don't understand why "my" value
isn't the default, but I don't care as long as I can
change it. Only for PR reasons with newcomers who are
perhaps not inclined to put hours on their systems,
which I don't mind (on the contrary), that's the only
thing, otherwise what does it matter what key it is or
function name or background color or whatever as long
as you can change it?

Isn't that the only way, and the easiest way as well,
to potentially everyone can be happy with their
software?

-- 
underground experts united