From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/4131 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F8gren?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: Gathering certain emails from across groups in one; labels Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:11:49 +0200 Organization: koldfront - analysis & revolution, Copenhagen, Denmark Message-ID: <87u0tjn6my.fsf@koldfront.dk> References: <87isa1ta97.fsf@koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138670115 21976 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 01:15:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:15:15 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:33:17 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!uninett.no!news.net.uni-c.dk!sunsite.dk!news.szn.dk!news.koldfront.dk!pnx.dk!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: topper.koldfront.dk Original-X-Trace: virgil.koldfront.dk 1096294309 29563 192.168.1.190 (27 Sep 2004 14:11:49 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@koldfront.dk Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:11:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Face: &DfBw60^ZxI8hd?J%t&_8wW?SLF%BBx<2XQ+sXYpX!?{=0C?9D{Nc`;Eq<0d=-L User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:mrLMqBERyTjo1IZECe5KQVx9vds= Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:4272 Original-Lines: 47 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 4272 Tue Jan 17 17:33:17 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:4131 Archived-At: On 27 Sep 2004 15:21:28 +0900, Alexandre wrote: > asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes: >> If I could label email and have a special group display all the >> emails with a given label, the problem would be solved. > It is probably very simplistic but why don't you create a > subdirectory such as ./Mail/keyword then save or copy the > corresponding mail in this directory? That would be efficient. It does have some drawbacks: * Ticking/caching¹ will be separate for the original email and the copies in the label-groups * Marks of other kinds will be separate (the "A"nswered possibly being quite important to the user/me :-)) * It is not easy to see what other labels the email you're reading has. * It is slightly more work to add an email to several labels (copy several times) * It is more work to change the labels under which an email is filed (instead of editing one email, I need to find all the copies and delete the ones that aren't relevant). There are probably other things I haven't thought of (good and bad). Best regards, Adam ¹ I often abuse caching for adding emphasis to my normal ticking of an article, so "! Blah blah" is an email I need to handle at some point, while "!* Bleh bleh" is an email I need to handle soon. -- "Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent Adam Sjøgren life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none asjo@koldfront.dk of it has tried to contact us."