mail splitting doesn't work

mail splitting doesn't work

[Pascal Bourguignon]

I customized nnmail split as indicated in info for gnu, but it doesn't
work, no splitting occurs either when I fetch new mail nor when I
respool the bogus mail group where all mails land eventually...

(custom-set-variables
 '(nnmail-split-fancy (quote (| (: nnmail-split-fancy-with-parent) ("From:" ".*Cron Daemon.*" "mail.cron") (To: ".*vms-list@voynich.net.*" "mail.voynich") (From: ".*gentoo.*" "mail.gentoo") (From: ".*zenith.*@zenit.org.*" "mail.zenith") (To: ".*\\(lisp.it\\|slime.*@common-lisp.net\\).*" "mail.lisp") (From: ".*\\(@freelance.com\\|@dice.com\\).*" "mail.jobs"))))
 '(nnmail-split-methods (quote nnmail-split-fancy))
 '(gnus-secondary-select-methods (quote ((nnml "")))))

What should I do to have my emails split into the right groups?

-- 
__Pascal Bourguignon__                     http://www.informatimago.com/

NOTE: The most fundamental particles in this product are held
together by a "gluing" force about which little is currently known
and whose adhesive power can therefore not be permanently
guaranteed.

Re: mail splitting doesn't work

[Katsumi Yamaoka]

>>>>> In <87veends6d.fsf@thalassa.lan.informatimago.com>
>>>>>	Pascal Bourguignon wrote:

> I customized nnmail split as indicated in info for gnu, but it doesn't
> work, no splitting occurs either when I fetch new mail nor when I
> respool the bogus mail group where all mails land eventually...

> (custom-set-variables
>  '(nnmail-split-fancy (quote (| (: nnmail-split-fancy-with-parent)
> ("From:" ".*Cron Daemon.*" "mail.cron")
> (To: ".*vms-list@voynich.net.*" "mail.voynich")
> (From: ".*gentoo.*" "mail.gentoo")
> (From: ".*zenith.*@zenit.org.*" "mail.zenith")
> (To: ".*\\(lisp.it\\|slime.*@common-lisp.net\\).*" "mail.lisp")
> (From: ".*\\(@freelance.com\\|@dice.com\\).*" "mail.jobs"))))

> What should I do to have my emails split into the right groups?

The first element of each split should be a string which is a
header name not containing ":", or a symbol defined in
`nnmail-split-abbrev-alist'.  In addition, all regexps are case
insensitive.  So, you may want to replace "From:" and From: with
"from" or just from, To: with "to" or to.

Regards,

Re: mail splitting doesn't work

[Pascal Bourguignon]

Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> writes:

>>>>>> In <87veends6d.fsf@thalassa.lan.informatimago.com>
>>>>>>	Pascal Bourguignon wrote:
>
>> I customized nnmail split as indicated in info for gnu, but it doesn't
>> work, no splitting occurs either when I fetch new mail nor when I
>> respool the bogus mail group where all mails land eventually...
>
>> (custom-set-variables
>>  '(nnmail-split-fancy (quote (| (: nnmail-split-fancy-with-parent)
>> ("From:" ".*Cron Daemon.*" "mail.cron")
>> (To: ".*vms-list@voynich.net.*" "mail.voynich")
>> (From: ".*gentoo.*" "mail.gentoo")
>> (From: ".*zenith.*@zenit.org.*" "mail.zenith")
>> (To: ".*\\(lisp.it\\|slime.*@common-lisp.net\\).*" "mail.lisp")
>> (From: ".*\\(@freelance.com\\|@dice.com\\).*" "mail.jobs"))))
>
>> What should I do to have my emails split into the right groups?
>
> The first element of each split should be a string which is a
> header name not containing ":", or a symbol defined in
> `nnmail-split-abbrev-alist'.  In addition, all regexps are case
> insensitive.  So, you may want to replace "From:" and From: with
> "from" or just from, To: with "to" or to.

Thanks.  Actually, for some reason I have From: there instead of
"From:"...  Anyways, now I changed them to the symbol any, and I had
to create the directories for the splitting to work.

-- 
__Pascal Bourguignon__                     http://www.informatimago.com/

NOTE: The most fundamental particles in this product are held
together by a "gluing" force about which little is currently known
and whose adhesive power can therefore not be permanently
guaranteed.

Re: mail splitting doesn't work

[Giorgos Keramidas]

On Mon, 21 May 2007 00:52:10 +0200, Pascal Bourguignon wrote:
> I customized nnmail split as indicated in info for gnu, but it doesn't
> work, no splitting occurs either when I fetch new mail nor when I
> respool the bogus mail group where all mails land eventually...
>
> (custom-set-variables
>  '(nnmail-split-fancy
>    (quote (| (: nnmail-split-fancy-with-parent)
>              ("From:" ".*Cron Daemon.*" "mail.cron")
>              (To: ".*vms-list@voynich.net.*" "mail.voynich")
>              (From: ".*gentoo.*" "mail.gentoo")
>              (From: ".*zenith.*@zenit.org.*" "mail.zenith")
>              (To: ".*\\(lisp.it\\|slime.*@common-lisp.net\\).*" "mail.lisp")
>              (From: ".*\\(@freelance.com\\|@dice.com\\).*" "mail.jobs"))))
>  '(nnmail-split-methods (quote nnmail-split-fancy))
>  '(gnus-secondary-select-methods (quote ((nnml "")))))
>
> What should I do to have my emails split into the right groups?

Hi Pascal,

As Katsumi Yamaoka-san has written, you have to use either a string in
the first element of each `split', or one of the supported keywords
(extending the keyword list is easy too, but it's not necessary here).

The above split could be written as:

    '(| (: nnmail-split-fancy-with-parent)
        (from ".*cron daemon.*" "mail.cron")
        (to ".*vms-list@voynich.net.*" "mail.voynich")
        (from ".*gentoo.*" "mail.gentoo")
        (from ".*zenith.*@zenit.org.*" "mail.zenith")
        (to ".*\\(lisp.it\\|slime.*@common-lisp.net\\).*" "mail.lisp")
        (from ".*\\(@freelance.com\\|@dice.com\\).*"
        "mail.jobs"))))

The nice thing about keywords is that they match more than one type of
email header:

,----[ Gnus manual.  Node: Fancy Mail Splitting ]-----------------------
|
| Predefined entries in `nnmail-split-abbrev-alist' include:
|
| `from'
|      Matches the `From', `Sender' and `Resent-From' fields.
|
| `to'
|      Matches the `To', `Cc', `Apparently-To', `Resent-To' and
|      `Resent-Cc' fields.
|
| `any'
|      Is the union of the `from' and `to' entries.
|
`-----------------------------------------------------------------------

The `from' keyword is probably less useful if you only want to split on
the "From:" header, but the `to' keyword is my all times favorite :-)

Cheers,
Giorgos