From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/17187 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: adapt in SCORE file does not work logicaly Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 05:56:16 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: <87y4saulcv.fsf@debian.uxu> References: <87a94raes3.fsf@debian.uxu> <87vbnfhbn3.fsf@Sony.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413864012 16288 80.91.229.3 (21 Oct 2014 04:00:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 04:00:12 +0000 (UTC) To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 21 06:00:07 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XgQcA-0005ym-TD for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:00:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47762 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgQcA-00049l-83 for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:06 -0400 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!goblin3!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Original-Lines: 53 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: feB02bRejf23rfBm51Mt7Q.user.speranza.aioe.org Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:y4tSkrShA81pZSxrN2rGZASHeog= Mail-Copies-To: never Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.gnus:88318 X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:17187 Archived-At: Stefan Huchler writes: > btw scoring is better than killing and what u do, > because u have no 0-1 switch but u can have > different levels of output quality filters, as > example hide thhreads that fall into several fitlers > and have a really bad (low) value, u could even sort > by value and see the one u are interested most first > and so on. > > I am just tired to hit 50 times a day L s s p and L > a e p (author exact permanenct) for every video, > when I know it could happen more or less automaticly > or by pressing only k for everthing I dont like. Scoring is perhaps better than killing and what I do, but this case doesn't show it because I never hit anything, and certainly not a four-key combination, 50 times a day. What you describe from scoring is some kind of interactive scoring where you score what you like (and dislike) in different ways. I'm not interested in that kind of scoring, I'm interested in me manually setting up rules and then have Gnus doing the scoring based on those rules and the input stream of messages, and then show me a "transformation" of that stream, transparently. Right now the splitting does that, and the killing does almost that (except it shows the messages as a digit in the group buffer before it kills them). Also, splitting and killing are very basic at this point (for me at least), they just split (to spam) or kill based on name and subject. I would like a more intelligent approach where the contents of the message is assessed rather than just a couple of static parameters. I.e, say some guy posts 100 posts, 10 are flame war posts, 10 are "1+" or "Me too" posts, but the 80 that remains are not bad at all. Here, I would like Gnus to only show the good posts. That is probably a non-trivial task to do, and it wouldn't be perfect, but I think it could be pretty good given some time for adjustments. There is a lot of material to train on so it could be a cool project in many ways :) -- underground experts united