From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 9903 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2023 07:40:08 -0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (209.51.188.17) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 23 Oct 2023 07:40:08 -0000 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qupXX-0008Bu-JM; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 03:39:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qupXW-0008B3-B3 for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 03:39:54 -0400 Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qupXU-0001hP-Jd for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 03:39:54 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qupXS-0003Z1-IX for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:39:50 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org From: Pankaj Jangid Subject: Re: Correct ordering of items in mail threads Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 13:09:43 +0530 Message-ID: <87zg09okhs.fsf@codeisgreat.org> References: <877cngr24w.fsf@codeisgreat.org> <87sf623nni.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87lebumy5a.fsf@codeisgreat.org> <871qdm62p0.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87fs22zjht.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <87wmve4mpb.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87bkcqziyj.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <87sf624m5v.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Guve4npzqGlPGDe03uWsS+z1qds= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+ml=inbox.vuxu.org@gnu.org Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+ml=inbox.vuxu.org@gnu.org >> I have configured Gnus to sort a bunch of groups by date instead of by >> number, and I can't feel the difference (in speed) -- this on a 4 year >> old laptop. >> >> Maybe I'm just growing slower ;-) > > Or all this just seems to matter less! I am using the following configuration since last 24h. #+begin_src elisp ;; Threading '(gnus-thread-sort-functions '(gnus-thread-sort-by-date)) '(gnus-summary-thread-gathering-function 'gnus-gather-threads-by-references) #+end_src I confirm that there is no noticeable lag in generating the summary buffer. However I have yet to verify the order of items. --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- E 20-10-23 23:18 PM [ 107: Victor Giordano ] => Re: [go-nuts] Re: About allowing conversion from bool to int O 21-10-23 02:44 AM [ 123: Victor Giordano ] +-> O 21-10-23 03:17 AM [ 142: Volker Dobler ] +-> O 21-10-23 06:01 AM [ 21: Ian Lance Taylor] +-> O 21-10-23 08:44 AM [ 57: Victor Giordano ] +-> E 21-10-23 18:27 PM [ 69: Victor Giordano ] +-> O 21-10-23 03:44 AM { 179: Victor Giordano } +-> Fwd: [go-nuts] Re: About allowing conversion from bool to int --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- In the above snapshot, items are still ordered incorrectly. This could be because of some other configuration. But I am not sure what. The last item in the above snapshot cannot be child of the one before it, even when I am using gnus-gather-threads-by-references. Is the following configuration correct? I am using this to decorate summary buffer. ;; Summary buffer formating '(gnus-sum-opening-bracket "[") '(gnus-sum-closing-bracket "]") '(gnus-sum-opening-bracket-adopted "{") '(gnus-sum-closing-bracket-adopted "}") '(gnus-sum-thread-tree-root "=> ") '(gnus-sum-thread-tree-false-root ">> ") '(gnus-sum-thread-tree-single-indent "=> ") '(gnus-sum-thread-tree-indent " ") '(gnus-sum-thread-tree-vertical "| ") '(gnus-sum-thread-tree-leaf-with-other "+-> ") '(gnus-sum-thread-tree-single-leaf "+-> ") '(gnus-user-date-format-alist '((t . "%d-%m-%y %H:%M %p"))) '(gnus-summary-line-format "%U%R%z %-5&user-date; %(%[%4L: %-16,16f%]%) %B%s\n")