* Re: LIST ACTIVE vs GROUP (was Re: Checking new news doesn't get new news)
[not found] ` <_fCcnWrgrbwk.eOgXTWQlg@News.GigaNews.Com>
@ 2002-09-11 17:49 ` Gerard Lanois
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Gerard Lanois @ 2002-09-11 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
Gerard Lanois <gerardlanois@netscape.net> writes:
> On the particular news server I am using, GROUP gives a more accurate
> answer, with the additional side effect of forcing all subsequent LIST
> ACTIVE commands to give the correct answer. That is why entering the
> group is causing more articles to become available to gnus.
>
> So, is there a way to control what NNTP command gnus uses to ask if
> there is new news? Maybe something to do with the function
> gnus-group-get-new-news?
I am achieving the desired effect (force use of GROUP instead of
LIST ACTIVE) by using M-g ('gnus-group-get-new-news-this-group').
But I have to do that individually on each of my groups.
So, how do I tell gnus-group-get-new-news to do it the same
way (use GROUP).
-Gerard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-09-11 17:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <le6dncoJo.4E4OugXTWQlg@News.GigaNews.Com>
[not found] ` <_fCcnWrgrbwk.eOgXTWQlg@News.GigaNews.Com>
2002-09-11 17:49 ` LIST ACTIVE vs GROUP (was Re: Checking new news doesn't get new news) Gerard Lanois
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).