From: aquila_deus@yahoo.co.uk (Aquila Deus)
Subject: Re: Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?
Date: 18 Sep 2004 00:30:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c5cfac8f.0409172330.2c681684@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2r14t7F14lvf5U1@uni-berlin.de>
"Mike Cox" <mikecoxlinux@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<2r14t7F14lvf5U1@uni-berlin.de>...
> "Tim McNamara" <timmcn@bitstream.net> wrote in message
> news:m2wtysbw01.fsf@Stella-Blue.local...
> > mikecoxlinux@yahoo.com (Mike Cox) writes:
> >
> > > I recently switched to xemacs as my default word processor so I
> > > could do formatting in TEX for a very long document. Most recently
> > > I've been using Microsoft Word, the latest version. I switched
> > > because I thought that emacs had perfect stability and no crashes.
> > > My perception was formed due to the constant FSF/GPL/Linux advocacy
> > > promoted on slashdot and all the comp newsgroups.
> >
> > As a couple of minor quibbles:
> >
> > 1. XEmacs is not Emacs, and XEmacs is not GNU or FSF software.
> > XEmacs and Emacs are not interchangeable.
>
> So which is better, XEmacs or GNU/Emacs?
XEmacs is faster, and easier to install, especially on windows.
>
> > 2. Nothing has perfect stability, everything else does not.
>
> I understand. So are you saying GNU/Emacs is more stable?
The CVS 21.3.50 I tried last year crashes almost everyday. And there
are always some weird problems in emacs with other packages (usually
out-dated and unmaintained). XEmacs beta has problems though, but not
serious.
>
> > 3. As a result, saving frequently and backing up one's documents is
> > always a good idea.
>
> So I could probably just use MS Word and get the features of VBA and COM+
> support, not to mention the robust default functionality? If everyone
> crashes, why not just use the most feature rich program that has the most
> users?
Word is designed for kids... there is even no regexp searching.
>
> > 4. Emacs by default creates backup documents, you'll find them in
> > the same directory as the file you were working on with a tilde
> > after the filename. Hopefully XEmacs, which I've never used, does
> > the same thing.
>
> I looked for it. I also did that ALT-M thing to try to recover. Whatever
> happened must of been quite serious because it ate my autosave document.
In fact I find auto-backup very annoying for me.
>
> > See:
> >
> > http://www.xemacs.org/About/XEmacsVsGNUemacs.html
> >
> > http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/emacs.html
>
> WOW. Those OSS/GNU guys really are immature. I followed a link on the
> xemacs.org site and they really duked it out over emacs. For those of you
> who would really like to see RMS and the XEMACS team battle from 15 years
> ago, visit this site:
> http://www.jwz.org/doc/lemacs.html
>
> Talk about a nasty exchange.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-18 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3d6111f1.0409161437.30ef8b7d@posting.google.com>
2004-09-17 6:02 ` Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document David Kastrup
[not found] ` <m2wtysbw01.fsf@Stella-Blue.local>
[not found] ` <2r14t7F14lvf5U1@uni-berlin.de>
2004-09-18 7:30 ` Aquila Deus [this message]
2004-09-18 22:14 ` Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs? Tim McNamara
2004-09-18 22:25 ` kier
[not found] ` <d60kym2k.fsf@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <x5brg3ucuw.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
2004-09-18 10:54 ` Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
[not found] ` <pan.2004.09.17.20.07.34.698482@that.google.thingy>
2004-09-18 22:07 ` Tim McNamara
[not found] ` <2qv41kF142tp6U1@uni-berlin.de>
2004-09-18 11:26 ` The Ghost In The Machine
[not found] ` <DAF3d.21961$ZC7.12096@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com>
2004-09-20 21:13 ` David Kastrup
[not found] ` <2r90j7F17iuf3U1@uni-berlin.de>
[not found] ` <x5k6uoa9ci.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
[not found] ` <2r96g3F182tnvU1@uni-berlin.de>
2004-09-21 0:08 ` Josh
[not found] ` <x5fz5c89yg.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
[not found] ` <2ra052F18agplU1@uni-berlin.de>
[not found] ` <x58yb4853b.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
2004-09-21 22:50 ` Mike Cox
2004-09-28 12:48 ` Miles Bader
[not found] ` <2rtt5bF1cs38gU2@uni-berlin.de>
[not found] ` <87d605yfac.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
[not found] ` <87k6ubq2u0.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp>
[not found] ` <87d603b1e9.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
2004-10-01 23:19 ` Miles Bader
2004-10-02 6:58 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c5cfac8f.0409172330.2c681684@posting.google.com \
--to=aquila_deus@yahoo.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).