From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/8675 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: Weird number of messages on server Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 11:35:58 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: References: <87mz45afe1.fsf@mother.nostromo.wy> <87iress8du.fsf@mother.nostromo.wy> <878xfefdbh.fsf@mother.nostromo.wy> <87tzy14w0x.fsf@ixod.org> <87bqk8uzfd.fsf@ixod.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170780041 25844 80.91.229.12 (6 Feb 2007 16:40:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 16:40:41 +0000 (UTC) To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 06 17:40:34 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HETMl-0003oo-MU for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 17:40:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HETMl-0007JP-EA for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 11:40:23 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!news.albasani.net!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Original-Lines: 42 Original-X-Trace: news.albasani.net pJn38/sSmmx+tW7QlpVpHYcUstxR1Z6+bgjZrIIB+x85BSHKFEoRv8Mow/5GZVzP6UWO6JdQKKLpkvn3go1eVQOvArLoT5JEJEpAwJfq6enJomTM/zlXHUEazG9DYRR/ Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@albasani.net Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 16:35:51 +0000 (UTC) X-User-ID: lo7o9zkSBE5REb0Q0bNeWMJcNPLU1DWdkZ/dvvu9aH8= X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Cancel-Lock: sha1:8CyPVgZn3GtO0o9pHAFYWs7cqUY= User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-NNTP-Posting-Host: vo0aNv65738zQ2fC07jyIcPr6GGLe3pBxFIKpLTJupM= Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.gnus:78858 X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:8675 Archived-At: On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 15:23:02 -0500 mark@ixod.org (Mark T.B. Carroll) wrote: MTBC> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 13:28:46 -0500 mark@ixod.org (Mark T.B. Carroll) wrote: MTBC> (snip) MTBC> I sometimes see something similar - see my report at MTBC> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=393546 >> MTBC> I find that removing all mention of the afflicted groups from Gnus' MTBC> files, then resubscribing, etc. fixes the problem when it happens. >> >> I hope that works. I've never seen this bug. If you can replicate it >> reliably, turn on the NNTP log, and try to submit a bug You may need >> to send us your newsrc.eld and other bits. MTBC> Cool. FWIW there's an NNTP log snip in that bug (it doesn't seem to MTBC> include the server's actual responses, just what was sent) and my MTBC> .gnus.el was as in MTBC> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=355071 MTBC> It's not happening at the moment, but if it happens again I'll gather a MTBC> copy of the newsrc.eld and let you guys know. Great, thanks Mark. If you don't hear from a Gnus developer in a few days, remind me and I'll follow up on the ding mailing list. MTBC> The only really irritating bug right now is MTBC> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=379665 MTBC> (I have seven open bugs filed with Debian) Unfortunately I don't use the Agent personally, and was not involved at all in the code for it, so I can't suggest anything. As with the other bug, let me know if you haven't heard about it from a Gnus developer. Generally Gnus bugs should be submitted with M-x gnus-bug instead of through Debian for the fastest response. I am on the ding mailing list, and I don't remember anything from the Debian people in years (but I may have missed it). We do get reports from Emacs, though, since Gnus is included in Emacs. Ted