From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/3858
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Raymond Scholz <ray-2004@zonix.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user
Subject: Re: Which mailbox the fastest for gnus?
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 13:48:00 +0200
Organization: =?us-ascii?Q?=3D=3FUTF-8=3FQ=3F=2F=3DCB=3D8C=3DC9=3D94=3DCB?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?=3D90=3DC9=3DA1=3DC9=3D99na=3DC9=3DAA=3DCB=3D88ze=3DC9=3DAA?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?=3DCA=3D83n=2F=3F=3D?=
Message-ID: <geg.87r7ss6h73@hush.zonix.de>
References: <wu2l9bz8.fsf@ipanel.cn>
Reply-To: Raymond Scholz <rscholz@zonix.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138669868 20652 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 01:11:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:11:08 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:32:51 2006
Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!nsc.no!nextra.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus
Original-X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de yE1zXqE/7QS288qvdQrmXg97vRMQd5hdBgH7DULd/MdfSaU1Q=
X-Orig-Path: hush.zonix.de!not-for-mail
X-Face: %.!RBc`e*wW)84O*\)VdkC}mU5c2Zh$y~ZRA3K594g/jp_&5bx\Oyes!/jK~4<<%KlaPn^\
 0<bYDHHvSRxI<
X-Now-Playing: Nothing
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:NWd2+Kchj4EJAdlxdUChqOOGBIg=
Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:3999
Original-Lines: 12
X-Gnus-Article-Number: 3999   Tue Jan 17 17:32:51 2006
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:3858
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/3858>

· Ding Lei <dinglei@ipanel.cn> wrote:

>   I am wondering which type of mailbox backend is the
> fast for Gnus(Linux). nnmaildir seems to be slow, &
> I need to deal with a quite a large amount of email,
> usually 2000+.

nnmaildir is sufficiently fast for me.  nnml should be even faster.

Cheers, Ray
-- 
Sigmentation fault, core dumped.