From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/3624
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Svend Tollak Munkejord <stm+direct_reply@bacchus.pvv.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user
Subject: Re: Can I get rid of the \201 ?
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:17:37 +0100
Organization: The Royal Society for Putting Things on Top of Other Things
Message-ID: <hddhdwqf8by.fsf@bacchus.pvv.ntnu.no>
References: <hddoerzs6s2.fsf@bacchus.pvv.ntnu.no> <hddvfl6fayw.fsf@bacchus.pvv.ntnu.no>
 <m3ptbef8sj.fsf@defun.localdomain>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138669675 19628 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 01:07:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:07:55 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:32:30 2006
Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail
Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: bacchus.pvv.ntnu.no
Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1079363857 5892 129.241.210.178 (15 Mar 2004 15:17:37 GMT)
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org
Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:17:37 +0000 (UTC)
Mail-Copies-To: never
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
X-Face: (2vS>!nr@2"*<u/Vs!.'EC%wn=Z{o.{|19gH.tRqnZCC[9;{7i.z<n{2fih6Ki\jX9e|:6N
 Sp'[ojB7"lCh~"1HNU8wEnZVg[Y]V>^KO{^8A<,_lGWx3HpnuA1UCA5vbsLl|2fZAV\T'x(3E`4@UJ
 >_mn@3S(.`C]g9DoFSSNAB@hftp\f-b#!UjRVfG5e#~H*^RvP+:meH63245"^?Zs7S[dE(SL`cn
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6BjvzWumPU9DdxNRprfCOATqqwc=
Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:3765
Original-Lines: 26
X-Gnus-Article-Number: 3765   Tue Jan 17 17:32:30 2006
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:3624
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/3624>

Today, Jesper Harder <harder@myrealbox.com> wrote:

> Svend Tollak Munkejord <stm+direct_reply@bacchus.pvv.org> writes:
>
>> I have found that the reason for the misbehaviour is my fancy
>> split-on-body function. However, I don't understand why. Can anyone
>> help?
>>
>> Here it is:
>>
>> ; in case we have base64 etc.
>> 	  (run-hooks 'gnus-article-decode-hook)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Don't do this, it modifies the message.  

You're right, thanks. This was the culprit.

> You probably have to make a copy of the message and work on that instead.

I'm afraid this goes beyond my limited elisp knowledge. Is there an
example I can have a look at somewhere?

Regards,
-- 
Svend Tollak Munkejord