From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/14067 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: clearing ham marks Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 01:52:58 +0200 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282780408 32009 80.91.229.12 (25 Aug 2010 23:53:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:53:28 +0000 (UTC) To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 26 01:53:25 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OoPmU-0004XZ-2Y for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 01:53:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57498 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OoPmT-0006Wv-G2 for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:53:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42550 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OoPmQ-0006Wg-Gw for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:53:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OoPmO-0001y5-Jk for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:53:18 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:53505) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OoPmO-0001xl-DD for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:53:16 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OoPmJ-0004Pz-S0 for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 01:53:11 +0200 Original-Received: from 85.183.18.158 ([85.183.18.158]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 01:53:11 +0200 Original-Received: from rileyrg by 85.183.18.158 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 01:53:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 8 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.183.18.158 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:14067 Archived-At: In groups that autodetect span and mark them accordingly when I exit that group is it possible for the ham marks to then be removed automatically after the spam exit processors have done their job? (in this case I am NOT moving the ham as they are in the correct mailbox already). thanks.