From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/14070 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: nnimap-split-inbox, spam-split and multiple inboxes Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 00:29:50 +0200 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282948215 30657 80.91.229.12 (27 Aug 2010 22:30:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 22:30:15 +0000 (UTC) To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 28 00:30:14 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Op7R7-00020T-At for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 00:30:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54868 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Op7R6-0006xW-Po for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:30:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59115 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Op7R0-0006ve-Ij for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:30:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Op7Qv-0003kA-JI for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:30:06 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:35932) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Op7Qv-0003j8-Ds for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:30:01 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Op7Qu-0001sq-Lb for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 00:30:00 +0200 Original-Received: from 85.183.18.158 ([85.183.18.158]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 00:30:00 +0200 Original-Received: from rileyrg by 85.183.18.158 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 00:30:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 44 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.183.18.158 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:14070 Archived-At: If someone has imap splitting working for multiple imap accounts couuld you please share your settings. I wish to use the spam-split functionality to auto move bogofilter detected spam to a temporary spam holding area. I have 3 inboxes displayed as nnimap+accA:INBOX nnimap+accB:INBOX nnimap+accC:INBOX Is it possible to split on the three? nearly all examples I have seen split a single INBOX (setq nnimap-split-inbox "INBOX") Can splitting work for three? Any pointers/suggestions appreciated. I turned up the verbosity for Gnus and dont currently see any splitting activity. I do have:- '(nnimap-split-rule (quote nnimap-split-fancy)) '(nnimap-split-fancy (quote (: spam-split))) and '(spam-mark-ham-unread-before-move-from-spam-group t) '(spam-mark-new-messages-in-spam-group-as-spam nil) '(spam-regex-headers-spam (quote ("^X-Spam-Flag: YES" "X-Bogosity"))) '(spam-split-group "Gnus-Spam") '(spam-use-bogofilter t) So spam-split should be using bogofilter to identify spam mail and moving them directly to Gnus-Spam. In the group settings for my INBOXs I set them as HAM groups since anything passing the splitting ought to be considered ham. Is that ok? The exit processors do correctly move any emails I manually tag as spam to the spam pen.