Re: Mailing List Replies (a different twist)

Re: Mailing List Replies (a different twist)

[Robin S. Socha]

* pete-temp <pete-temp-12-29-2002@kazmier.com> writes:

> I have a question on how to reply to a mailing list that does not
> specify a Reply-To header. [...]  Specifically, I have *not* created a
> separate group for this mailing list so the usual "set the to-address
> in your group parameters" doesn't apply here.

See the Node "Posting Styles" in your Gnus manual. Other approaches: use
maildrop/reformail[1] to rewrite your headers, inserting an MFT for this
list.

[mutt list reply]
> Does Gnus have anything similar or another approach to address the
> issue? 

No, and it's one thing I really used to like about mutt. Rewriting the
message proper makes you independent of the MUA used, so I'd rather use
this approach if you can.

Footnotes: 
[1]  <http://www.courier-mta.org/reformail.html>

Re: Mailing List Replies (a different twist)

[Karl Kleinpaste]

pete-temp-12-29-2002@kazmier.com writes:
> I have a question on how to reply to a mailing list that does not
> specify a Reply-To header.  

Followup (which starts a "wide reply", for mail).  Remove individual
users' addresses, leaving just the mailing list.

Granted, it's not as automatic as a group-per-list arrangement with
the "to" parameter set, but then you're operating in a bit of a
self-made purgatory, in wanting a mailing list mixed in with personal
mail.