From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/2250
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Shao Zhang <shaoz@activesky.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user
Subject: Re: help with spam.el
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:54:38 +1100
Message-ID: <kfd6kc6t8h.fsf@shaoz.activesky.com.au>
References: <kfisuevghb.fsf@shaoz.activesky.com.au> <4nhe9yeykj.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu>
 <kfvfy963bf.fsf@shaoz.activesky.com.au>
 <4n7kaopvz5.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu>
 <kfptoflzbj.fsf@shaoz.activesky.com.au>
 <4nvfy6850a.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu>
 <kfisu53duw.fsf@shaoz.activesky.com.au>
 <4nu1do4sb6.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138668752 14473 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 00:52:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:52:32 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:30:24 2006
Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!nsc.no!nextra.com!Norway.EU.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!203.185.212.194!not-for-mail
Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.185.212.194
Original-X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1048823684 559933 203.185.212.194 (16 [76489])
X-Face: $>)r}og6b.JbA$y%X0q?2"p4u&N/WI_fF>^HU'dC+Ze8t]K-SgKfn%U<J&~6;jq><r=d4*< V4(})rKuq[(@)pei@M3`c-}aG@[^6z?5"(R]:.)?vPc*n|vRM~<p3Z_[zW`Kmp@PR+q^J}=.e9NyU
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.2 (berkeley-unix)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EQ/oLChVqaXwlkpMFF8uBLpkGjY=
Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:2390
Original-Lines: 40
X-Gnus-Article-Number: 2390   Tue Jan 17 17:30:24 2006
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:2250
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/2250>

On [Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:45:17 -0500], Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> wrote:
> That's probably because you have not trained ifile yet!  Try
> spam-use-blackholes for instance, you can use it in addition to
> spam-use-ifile and it will catch quite a lot of spam.

Please see my reply to an earlier article in this thread. My problem is
that I set the spam-split-group to be nnfolder+archive:spam which turns
out to be nnimap+xyz:nnfolder+archive:spam

I am now almost there, except a few small problems.
Here is my latest config:

'(gnus-ham-process-destinations (quote ((".*spam" "nnimap:~/Mail/inbox"))))
'(gnus-spam-newsgroup-contents (quote ((".*spam" gnus-group-spam-classification-spam) (".*inbox" gnus-group-spam-classification-ham))))
'(gnus-spam-process-destinations (quote (("nnimap.*" "nnfolder+archive:spam"))))
'(gnus-spam-process-newsgroups (quote ((".*" (gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-ifile gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-ifile)))))
'(spam-ifile-ham-category "ham")
'(spam-junk-mailgroups (quote ("nnfolder+archive:spam")))
'(spam-mark-ham-unread-before-move-from-spam-group nil)
'(spam-split-group "~/Mail/spam")
'(spam-use-ifile t))

my problem 1:

nnimap+private:~/Mail/inbox is spam split into nnimap+private:~/Mail/spam
nnimap:work:~/Mail/inbox is spam split into nnimap+work:~/Mail/spam
Manually marked articles are processed into nnfolder+archive:spam

I would like to have all these spams end up in one folder only. I cannot
find a way to specify that at the moment.

my problem 2:

Sometimes, spam split wrongly puts some hams in ~/Mail/spam. I tried to
mark the article as unread, but it still does not transfer the article
back to ~/Mail/inbox given I have set the ham-process-destinations.

Thanks for your help in advance.

Shao.