From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/18926 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Damien Collard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: Way to detect "raw" display of article? Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:54:45 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87zhpu6wwf.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="101715"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (darwin) Cc: info-gnus-english@gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 17 10:06:53 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h5Rkn-000QGP-Hn for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 10:06:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52065 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5Rkm-0005Pk-CP for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 05:06:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5Rkk-0005NY-0I for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 05:06:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5RZD-00050e-G6 for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 04:54:52 -0400 Original-Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.232]:56069) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5RZD-0004yS-5h for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 04:54:51 -0400 Original-Received: from FataMorgana (tou31-2-82-243-113-37.fbx.proxad.net [82.243.113.37]) (Authenticated sender: damien.collard@distfp.net) by relay12.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47AC5200003; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 08:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEXamX/28r34+frw9ONc Nxl4bnZiOH0iAAAAB3RJTUUHsQwfFzs7RBhzUQAAAi1JREFUOI1llMF2ozAMRaXB7K247BM4 3QNq9mQq780E/v9X5slJm7TJghN0LfnpWYb6x29snl7o8XfY8vwKtO/fzf69gJknDWafv8HA FFvLH39/g9PKMu2Xj5dSIyeRyOEFRJ1EJNjhFxhYVSKFrHPV9w2OY0xcJC7Hg477/AAkysQS 8zm1XffnGwzXwzCScLQ27hy/wJHG63xEFxy3hZoH2MzWGXbYKsL8AINh7fyezS4QxsxyB6PZ wvPbVoG0VIRv4N2EWBEHQJyIu/kGch9ZzEGK2AbW1Fp0NArMDq6ySQXX780bddCcswiBlLnK DQ6wR9ZtgWBP2YkS9ac9X/TNjCfLsN6LuRRYMuxX1ZiUN9utgoh9K0iqOo3LluMuT0AJcUlu TdfGSgz99EMsWI9Vhla7J3BiQSlvEaI6upfyjF2wd65m4RAddA6GSJImF+iKqikxLAAjXhMG pG3NJ4jjitGrGdSKTt2CKhghWtGdp7tcAJ1Q4joJtQtAoeCdD6uLwow0Ny+gDgAZo0gFpCK7 LSFUALnSfVbAACV48AYGohWNr5HxLK7nC6wYdYQiuhlpuQM0gsn1rlqMaTpzCXfQkl8ODJMf XQpC94x9cSAjrwXaukt1CcDKAeCkI5XMGrcGs+ggLHOd9pPEtmSy1T0BMMRv16CRMzysxm6e MX9dnLl/g7V6P+18ePoAbFmm5GcUKDf9D8Ca6s0N1x8fgD0nrVc6hsMzOJbiID2B/xMvm7VL qL0FAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC In-Reply-To: <87zhpu6wwf.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Sat, 16 Mar 2019 19:46:08 -0700") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 217.70.178.232 X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "info-gnus-english" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:18926 Archived-At: On Sam, mar 16 2019, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > I think the "appropriate" way of doing this would be to make this a > washing function that does this on command, then a corresponding > `gnus-treat-FOO' variable, then allow people to set that as they like. This works very well, thank you! And it's cleaner than my abusing of `fontification-functions` previously (for which I had to make sure the prettification was only performed once). Now to see if I can avoid using `fontification-functions` in message-mode... -- Damien Collard