From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/3164 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tim McNamara Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: Active links in Gnus? Date: 08 Nov 2003 12:34:24 -0600 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138669356 17852 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 01:02:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:02:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nobody Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:31:48 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!nsc.no!nextra.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!priapus.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!gemini.bitstream.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Original-Sender: tim@localhost.bitstream.net Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 7c186986.news.bitstream.net Original-X-Trace: 1068316530 gemini.bitstream.net 1099 216.243.177.155 Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@bitstream.net Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:3305 Original-Lines: 30 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 3305 Tue Jan 17 17:31:48 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:3164 Archived-At: Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> writes: > On Sat, Nov 08 2003, Tim McNamara wrote: > > | X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 > > If you're using this versions, you should definitively consider > upgrading. Yah. I didn't realize this version was that much older than the Aqua version I also have! > > How does Emacs/Gnus know which program to forward the URL to? > > Emacs checks the variable `browse-url-browser-function', see `C-h v > browse-url-browser-function RET'. Depending on your Emacs version > it will offer Mozilla directly or you may have to use > `browse-url-generic-program'. > > > Is this information in a .conf file somewhere? > > Put something like this your ~/.emacs [1] file: > > (setq browse-url-browser-function 'browse-url-generic) > (setq browse-url-generic-program "mozilla") Thanks, I'll give that a try. My .emacs is probably still pretty minimalist compared to more experienced users, I suspect. Thanks again!