From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/1329 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jesper Harder Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: Message IDs and qmail Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 17:15:21 +0200 Organization: http://purl.org/harder/ Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138668123 10832 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 00:42:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:28:59 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!lackawana.kippona.com!news.teledanmark.no!news.tele.dk!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus X-Face: ^RrvqCr7c,P$zTR:QED"@h9+BTm-"fjZJJ-3=OU7.)i/K]<.J88}s>'Z_$r; Paolo Amoroso writes: > Finally, here are my questions: > > - Is getting rid of the `Sender:' field a good idea in the first > place? Yes. There's no point in including a misleading header. The only caveat is that maybe Gnus will complain if you try to cancel or supersede your own messages. > - If so, how do I get rid of `Sender:', or change it so that its value is > paolo.amoroso@mclink.it? (add-to-list 'message-syntax-checks '(sender . disabled)) > - Which application should I let generate message IDs? Gnus or qmail? If Gnus generates them, they can be used for scoring. If you don't use that, it doesn't matter if Gnus or qmail generates them.