From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/4757 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Bruno Hertz" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: How to get new mail without leaving Summary buffer? Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:22:29 +0200 Organization: Cablecom Newsserver Message-ID: References: <1112122381.540998.304930@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138670660 24753 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 01:24:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:34:16 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!news.powertech.no!news.banetele.no!news.hacking.dk!pnx.dk!zen.net.uk!dedekind.zen.co.uk!216.196.110.149.MISMATCH!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsfeed.inode.at!news.hispeed.ch!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 80-218-17-54.dclient.hispeed.ch Original-X-Trace: news.hispeed.ch 1112124117 5483 80.218.17.54 (29 Mar 2005 19:21:57 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: news@hispeed.ch Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:21:57 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:epOS2rKbduZrXcrV9UGCrHdewUg= Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:4898 Original-Lines: 22 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 4898 Tue Jan 17 17:34:16 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:4757 Archived-At: "napofrog" writes: > Hi, > > While in a summary buffer, I'm trying to get new mail into it without > exiting the summary buffer. I was under the impression that this is > what '/ N' is for. But whether or not I have gotten new mail from the > server with 'g' in the Group buffer, the only thing that '/ N' ever > does for me is to remove everything from the current summary buffer > except for the message that the cursor is currently on. What should I > be doing instead? > > Thanks, > > Roger M-g The same applies in the group buffer, if you want to catch mail only for the group on point. Regards, Bruno.