From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/3085
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jesper Harder <harder@myrealbox.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user
Subject: Re: Can I split messages based on their size?
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 17:32:01 +0200
Organization: http://purl.org/harder/
Message-ID: <m3fzhubjpq.fsf@defun.localdomain>
References: <hddd6d5tugn.fsf@bacchus.pvv.ntnu.no> <m37k3ai5og.fsf@defun.localdomain>
 <hddoewi6g50.fsf@bacchus.pvv.ntnu.no>
 <hdd8ynmvn70.fsf@bacchus.pvv.ntnu.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138669299 17573 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 01:01:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:01:39 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:31:40 2006
Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!nsc.no!nextra.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!not-for-mail
Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus
X-Face: ^RrvqCr7c,P$zTR:QED"@h9+BTm-"fjZJJ-3=OU7.)i/K]<.J88}s>'Z_$r;<N5ksn~%wJ@2pjF}="tV;FBsdpFarSWA<oYkZsViGf:F^SD-KXhvFxh;~]?)SWm~+u};0=x}<vOm&5J+?]yB2d]q4x8\0g7SX
Mail-Copies-To: never
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nesksnLzvo68aoGfhlPdSOXcIJA=
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.249.83.120
Original-X-Trace: 1066232074 dtext02.news.tele.dk 94878 195.249.83.120:48333
Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@post.tele.dk
Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:3226
Original-Lines: 37
X-Gnus-Article-Number: 3226   Tue Jan 17 17:31:40 2006
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:3085
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/3085>

Svend Tollak Munkejord <stm@bacchus.pvv.org> writes:

> OK. I only tried "B t" (trace respool), and not actually to respool
> ("B r"). Respooling worked, and the complete message size seemed to
> be accounted for. With the following extension, "B t" worked as well
> (Gnus 5.10.2).
>
> Is it a semi-bug that I had to set the buffer this way?

Yes, but it's fixed in CVS (I also noticed it when I tried `B t'):

diff -u gnus/lisp/gnus-sum.el:6.360 gnus/lisp/gnus-sum.el:6.361
--- gnus-sum.el:6.360	Thu Aug  7 04:00:45 2003
+++ gnus-sum.el	Sun Oct 12 22:45:23 2003
@@ -9476,15 +9476,13 @@
     (gnus-summary-select-article)
     (save-excursion
       (set-buffer gnus-original-article-buffer)
-      (save-restriction
-	(message-narrow-to-head)
-	(let ((groups (nnmail-article-group 'identity trace)))
-	  (unless silent
-	    (if groups
-		(message "This message would go to %s"
-			 (mapconcat 'car groups ", "))
-	      (message "This message would go to no groups"))
-	    groups))))))
+      (let ((groups (nnmail-article-group 'identity trace)))
+	(unless silent
+	  (if groups
+	      (message "This message would go to %s"
+		       (mapconcat 'car groups ", "))
+	    (message "This message would go to no groups"))
+	  groups)))))
 
 (defun gnus-summary-respool-trace ()
   "Trace where the respool algorithm would put this article.