From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/4018 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Harry Putnam Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: bogofilter behavior Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 16:39:30 -0500 Organization: Still searching... Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138670039 21474 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 01:13:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:33:06 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!uio.no!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!news.zanker.org!newsfeeder.wxs.nl!pln-w!spln!dex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news3 Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: p-059.newsdawg.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:eqkASZ8GzKe75NrE1Il2cPr8RCQ= Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:4159 Original-Lines: 11 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 4159 Tue Jan 17 17:33:06 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:4018 Archived-At: Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> writes: > It seems that the meaning of those have changed [2]. I hope that the > values in `spam.el' are suitable for current bogofilter: > > spam-bogofilter-spam-switch "-s" > spam-bogofilter-ham-switch "-n" > spam-bogofilter-spam-strong-switch "-S" > spam-bogofilter-ham-strong-switch "-N" On the surface it would appear not...