From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/4886 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Bruno Hertz" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: Advice what to use for html rendering (rss). Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:30:04 +0200 Organization: Cablecom Newsserver Message-ID: References: <85psx1niwx.fsf@obelix.seki.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138670748 25277 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 01:25:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:34:27 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!irazu.switch.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.hispeed.ch!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 80-218-17-54.dclient.hispeed.ch Original-X-Trace: news.hispeed.ch 1113255004 31923 80.218.17.54 (11 Apr 2005 21:30:04 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: news@hispeed.ch Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:30:04 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:XReo8U7l9OJM+1HYgMDux0cwSJA= Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:5027 Original-Lines: 24 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 5027 Tue Jan 17 17:34:27 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:4886 Archived-At: Sébastien Kirche writes: > Le 11 avr 2005, Bruno Hertz a dit : > >> Looking around for alternatives like w3, I found it's not very clear >> whether that package is still maintained, by whom, and where best to >> download it. >> >> I'd hence highly appreciate any input on what package you found to >> work best (e.g. with Emacs CVS), and where to obtain a current >> version. > > You should take a look to emacs-w3m (http://emacs-w3m.namazu.org/) that is > (imo) a good alternative to w3 and is currently developed. Great! Just installed it, and it comes out very nice. Especially the rendered pages look really good, and are displayed without hiding the summary buffer. Very pleasing especially compared to w3 CVS, which I tried right before this one, and which gave me errors I couldn't fix, presumably related to bad compilation. Anyways, w3m goes smooth enough ... Many thanks, Bruno.