From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/4868 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: david.goldberg6@verizon.net (David S. Goldberg) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: Reading encrypted+signed S/MIME messages Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 13:28:11 -0400 Organization: I Yam What I Yam Message-ID: References: <87hdik81of.fsf@blackbird.zamazal.org> <874qekknty.fsf@seamus.arnested.dk> <871x9m99mg.fsf@blackbird.zamazal.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138670736 25193 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 01:25:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:25:36 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:34:25 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!bigboote.WPI.EDU!news.tufts.edu!newstransit.mitre.org!news.mitre.org!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: blackbird.mitre.org Original-X-Trace: newslocal.mitre.org 1112894891 5244 129.83.50.102 (7 Apr 2005 17:28:11 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: news@mitre.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) XEmacs/21.4.15 (cygwin32) Cancel-Lock: sha1:j45PYfTqjrtdOKstXk3jPL/Uc1E= Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:5009 Original-Lines: 17 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 5009 Tue Jan 17 17:34:25 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:4868 Archived-At: >>>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:50:17 -0400, david.goldberg6@verizon.net >>>>> (David S. Goldberg) said: > I had the same problem with 0.9.7e (cygwin). It works for me now > with 0.9.7f. I take it back. It worked in some limited testing for me with 0.9.7f but when using it to either cc myself or gcc on an email with more than one recipient, it still failed. Same issue too: can't determine the pkcs7 type, presumably due to the magic number issue, but running openssl on the command line properly decrypts and verifies it. Therefore I still find myself requiring the multipart hack I posted here and on the ding list a month or so ago. -- Dave Goldberg david.goldberg6@verizon.net