From: kier <vallon@tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 23:25:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2004.09.18.22.25.28.282475@tiscali.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2u0tvmdhu.fsf@Stella-Blue.local>
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 17:14:05 -0500, Tim McNamara wrote:
> "Mike Cox" <mikecoxlinux@yahoo.com> writes:
>
>> "Tim McNamara" <timmcn@bitstream.net> wrote in message
>> news:m2wtysbw01.fsf@Stella-Blue.local...
>>> mikecoxlinux@yahoo.com (Mike Cox) writes:
>>>
>>> > I recently switched to xemacs as my default word processor so I
>>> > could do formatting in TEX for a very long document. Most
>>> > recently I've been using Microsoft Word, the latest version. I
>>> > switched because I thought that emacs had perfect stability and
>>> > no crashes. My perception was formed due to the constant
>>> > FSF/GPL/Linux advocacy promoted on slashdot and all the comp
>>> > newsgroups.
>>>
>>> As a couple of minor quibbles:
>>>
>>> 1. XEmacs is not Emacs, and XEmacs is not GNU or FSF software.
>>> XEmacs and Emacs are not interchangeable.
>>
>> So which is better, XEmacs or GNU/Emacs?
>
> Both.
>
>>> 2. Nothing has perfect stability, everything else does not.
>>
>> I understand. So are you saying GNU/Emacs is more stable?
>
> No. I've never used XEmacs, so I cannot comment on it.
I have. It's never crashed on me.
>
>>> 3. As a result, saving frequently and backing up one's documents
>>> is
>>> always a good idea.
>>
>> So I could probably just use MS Word and get the features of VBA and
>> COM+ support, not to mention the robust default functionality? If
>> everyone crashes, why not just use the most feature rich program
>> that has the most users?
>
> Ummm, the feature set of Emacs and XEmacs blows Word out of the water,
> Mike. All Word can do is word processing. Emacs can read your
> e-mail, Usenet news (I'm using it now for this), run spreadsheets,
> browse the Web, and make coffee. Well, not directly. Yer just
> trolling with these questions.
Well, he *is* a troll. :-)
>
>>> 4. Emacs by default creates backup documents, you'll find them in
>>> the same directory as the file you were working on with a tilde
>>> after the filename. Hopefully XEmacs, which I've never used,
>>> does the same thing.
It does. Easily recoverable.
>>
>> I looked for it. I also did that ALT-M thing to try to recover.
>> Whatever happened must of been quite serious because it ate my
>> autosave document.
We believe you. Not.
>
> Hummm. Did you read the docs before using?
I doubt it.
>
>>> See:
>>>
>>> http://www.xemacs.org/About/XEmacsVsGNUemacs.html
>>>
>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/emacs.html
>>
>> WOW. Those OSS/GNU guys really are immature. I followed a link on
>> the xemacs.org site and they really duked it out over emacs. For
>> those of you who would really like to see RMS and the XEMACS team
>> battle from 15 years ago, visit this site:
>> http://www.jwz.org/doc/lemacs.html
>>
>> Talk about a nasty exchange.
>
> Nothing like the venom of those who've spent thousands of dollars on
> Microsoft products that are barely functional.
--
Kier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-18 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3d6111f1.0409161437.30ef8b7d@posting.google.com>
2004-09-17 6:02 ` Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document David Kastrup
[not found] ` <2qv41kF142tp6U1@uni-berlin.de>
2004-09-18 11:26 ` The Ghost In The Machine
[not found] ` <m2wtysbw01.fsf@Stella-Blue.local>
[not found] ` <d60kym2k.fsf@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <x5brg3ucuw.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
2004-09-18 10:54 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
[not found] ` <pan.2004.09.17.20.07.34.698482@that.google.thingy>
2004-09-18 22:07 ` Tim McNamara
[not found] ` <2r14t7F14lvf5U1@uni-berlin.de>
2004-09-18 7:30 ` Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs? Aquila Deus
2004-09-18 22:14 ` Tim McNamara
2004-09-18 22:25 ` kier [this message]
[not found] ` <DAF3d.21961$ZC7.12096@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com>
2004-09-20 21:13 ` Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document David Kastrup
[not found] ` <2r90j7F17iuf3U1@uni-berlin.de>
[not found] ` <x5k6uoa9ci.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
[not found] ` <2r96g3F182tnvU1@uni-berlin.de>
2004-09-21 0:08 ` Josh
[not found] ` <x5fz5c89yg.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
[not found] ` <2ra052F18agplU1@uni-berlin.de>
[not found] ` <x58yb4853b.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
2004-09-21 22:50 ` Mike Cox
2004-09-28 12:48 ` Miles Bader
[not found] ` <2rtt5bF1cs38gU2@uni-berlin.de>
[not found] ` <87d605yfac.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
[not found] ` <87k6ubq2u0.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp>
[not found] ` <87d603b1e9.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
2004-10-01 23:19 ` Miles Bader
2004-10-02 6:58 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pan.2004.09.18.22.25.28.282475@tiscali.co.uk \
--to=vallon@tiscali.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).