From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/4443
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Xavier Maillard <zedek@gnu-rox.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user
Subject: Re: My anti-spam measures no long work :(
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 08:41:26 +0100
Organization: GNU Rox !
Message-ID: <plop87ekfqb2op.fsf@gnu-rox.org>
References: <plop87fz1f52v8.fsf@gnu-rox.org> <4nd5vavolo.fsf@lifelogs.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138670357 23256 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 01:19:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:19:17 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:33:46 2006
Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!proxad.net!nerim.net!noc.nerim.net!news.gnu-rox.org!not-for-mail
Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: totoz.gnu-rox.org
Original-X-Trace: localhost.localdomain 1107979001 20328 10.0.0.3 (9 Feb 2005 19:56:41 GMT)
Original-X-Complaints-To: postmaster@gnu-rox.org
Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 19:56:41 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
X-Face: "<qi!*!1hh&4O}<Lm,UESTRpd?#,#2dl.=::OS.<#J>qG{UC8GPzro#PZ!Jgisuj0]=k10
 f#d596CJMPGOGwB'j\^JR2g0']N%L:ylC`?.l8u#JuS#CygUA}avHHVJJ!#ub7CxX#u]g}?z,hQ;c
 q%v]"[$!BfS
Mail-Copies-To: never
X-Attribution: zeDek
X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, en-en, en-fr
OpenPGP: id=1E028EA5; url=http://zedek.nerim.net/Docs/key.txt
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9mCKxMn0cwxHLok9+gojYPZ/3BU=
Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:4584
Original-Lines: 33
X-Gnus-Article-Number: 4584   Tue Jan 17 17:33:46 2006
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:4443
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/4443>

On  8 fév 2005, Ted Zlatanov wrote:

> On Wed, 05 Jan 2005, zedek@gnu-rox.org wrote:
> 
> > Dunno since when it occurs, but I no longer have the spam
> > mark on my spam groups and thus I can't respool ham from spam
> > groups.
> > 
> > The weird thing is that, spam-split still continues to feed
> > my spam groups with UCE messages and in nntp groups, the spam
> > mark is correctly set to show me which are spam or not.
> 
> Your spam groups' content parameters are no longer correct, I
> think.
> 
> Check (gnus-parameter-spam-contents "your group here") to see
> exactly what Gnus believes.

Hum, you are right. Gnus believes it is ham group...

But how is this possible ? Why `spam-split-group' value is not
meant to be automatically classified as a spam content group ?

What should I check to fix my problem ?

Thank you Ted.
-- 
  "GNU is my religion"

.O.  Xavier Maillard 
..O   Reims - France 
OOO  +33 6 68 04 64 37