From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/5931 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xavier Maillard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Gnus vs =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cache=A0=3A?= need advice plus a question Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 18:23:45 +0100 Organization: GNU Rox ! Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138671557 29429 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 01:39:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:39:17 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:36:03 2006 Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 10.0.0.2 Original-X-Trace: gnarf.gnu-rox.org 1130692892 14026 10.0.0.2 (30 Oct 2005 17:21:32 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@gnu-rox.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:21:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Face: "qG{UC8GPzro#PZ!Jgisuj0]=k10 f#d596CJMPGOGwB'j\^JR2g0']N%L:ylC`?.l8u#JuS#CygUA}avHHVJJ!#ub7CxX#u]g}?z,hQ;c q%v]"[$!BfS Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: zeDek X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, en-en, en-fr User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:V61aNrKdhIedd1+T0tDaTKfhRvk= Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed.gazeta.pl!newsfeed.tpinternet.pl!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.tiscali.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!news.osn.de!diablo1-ffm.news.osn.de!newsfeed.kamp.net!news.musoftware.de!rouhivuori!gnarf.gnu-rox.org!gnu-rox.org!not-for-mail Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:6073 Original-Lines: 22 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 6073 Tue Jan 17 17:36:03 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:5931 Archived-At: Hello, After months of tries, I still do not « master » gnus agent features. This is regrettable but that is it. It often interferes (at least in my mind) with gnus caching mechanism. So, is there any benefit to use both mechanism, just one but then, which one ? I know I can have same features with cache than with agent except agent allows to be « offline ». If someone has hints on what I should use, I will take it :) Second is more a problem : my server buffer presents to me a double entry for my nnimap server which is quite weird. Is there any solution to delete the culprit entry ? (I already tried 'k' on the second entry but got an error message.) Thanks all -- No e-patents, pas de brevets logiciels Pétition contre les brevets logiciels : http://petition.eurolinux.org