From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/3714 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: bkhl@elektrubadur.se (=?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F6rn_Lindstr=F6m?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: Problems with spam.el again Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 01:04:50 +0200 Organization: Dept. of Linguistics and Philology, Uppsala University, Sweden Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138669735 20011 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 01:08:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:08:55 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:32:38 2006 Mail-Copies-To: never Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus X-Home-Page: http://bkhl.elektrubadur.se/ User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:j75bLZOGeznmUilAU4EUtg0u4K4= Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: numerus.ling.uu.se Original-X-Trace: puffinus.its.uu.se 1081983891 numerus.ling.uu.se (15 Apr 2004 01:04:51 +0100) Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!nsc.no!nextra.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!luth.se!luth.se!193.180.251.40.MISMATCH!erinews.ericsson.se!newsfeed.sunet.se!news01.sunet.se!puffinus.its.uu.se Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:3855 Original-Lines: 37 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 3855 Tue Jan 17 17:32:38 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:3714 Archived-At: Adrian Lanz writes: > Try this to initialize the spam tools (I think you don't need > "(require 'spam)"): > > ;; Spam > (spam-initialize) > (gnus-registry-initialize) > (setq spam-log-to-registry t) > > ;; Processsor for splitting incoming mail > (setq spam-use-bogofilter t) It seems that I do need the (require 'spam). Also, I need to do (require 'gnus-registry) to use (gnus-registry-initialize > You can test which splitting methods (spam, duplicates, group > parameters, bbdb) causes the error by simply commenting them out one > by one. That's what I did to find out that spam-split was the only problem there. > Also - normally this would not be needed, but ... - replace > "(: spam-split)" with "(: spam-split 'spam-use-bogofilter)". What > happens if you set: > > (setq nnmail-split-methods 'nnmail-split-fancy > nnmail-split-fancy > `(| > (: spam-split 'spam-use-bogofilter) > "misc")) That gives the exact same problems. -- Björn Lindström http://bkhl.elektrubadur.se/