From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/4251 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bill Harris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: pgg, gnupg, and PGP? Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:20:55 GMT Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net Message-ID: References: <87r7mzt87k.fsf@koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138670218 22480 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 01:16:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:16:58 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:33:28 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed.gazeta.pl!newsfeed.pionier.net.pl!news.glorb.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net.POSTED!4968b1b5!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:zHz9rOTA6uzkMXaRlA04jrIaFkc= Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.16.250.11 Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net Original-X-Trace: newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net 1100550055 4.16.250.11 (Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:20:55 PST) Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:20:55 PST Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:4392 Original-Lines: 39 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 4392 Tue Jan 17 17:33:28 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:4251 Archived-At: =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sj=F8gren) writes: > Perhaps by modifying ~/.gnupg/options? I've got this in mine: > > # The next option is enabled because this one is needed for interoperati= on > # with PGP 5 users. To enable full OpenPGP compliance you have to remove > # this option. > > force-v3-sigs Windows Privacy Tray didn't seem to give me a gnupg.conf.skel or whatever, so I created a gnupg.conf with your suggested content, and I'll test it to see if both my PGP and GnuPG colleagues can verify signatures.=20=20 > I haven't noticed any drawbacks by not having "full OpenPGP > compliance", but I haven't looked into the issue either, so YMMV. I did a quick search but turned up nothing of interest. Thanks, Bill =2D --=20 Bill Harris Facilitated Systems http://facilitatedsystems.com/ =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: For more information, see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFBmQ+k3J3HaQTDvd8RAhZ0AJ9cPZOGIfZURN44HV3ZM+JhWvC1MACdE7Mk l/22Jto4Es/u+V3WQB0EHpI=3D =3DV+1v =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----